How general is the incongruity effect in social episodic memory?

Research findings suggest that people remember reputational information that is incongruent to their expectations particularly well. However, in most of these experiments, the same facial images were used during both the learning and testing phases. This raises the question of whether participants truly recognised the individuals (identity recognition) or merely remembered specific pictorial details. The present experiment investigated whether changing the viewing perspective during the testing phase would yield similar results compared to a control condition using the classical design (i.e., identical facial images during learning and testing). The results revealed a source memory advantage for cheaters in both the changed perspective and the control condition. These findings suggest that participants did not rely solely on pictorial details but were able to recognise the individuals and recall their cheating behaviour.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Memory
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2026.2719607
Primary Topic
Memory Processes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How general is the incongruity effect in social episodic memory?

Meike Kroneisen, Clara Schaub
Memory
Memory Processes and Influences
article

How general is the incongruity effect in social episodic memory?

Meike Kroneisen, Clara Schaub
article en

Abstract

Research findings suggest that people remember reputational information that is incongruent to their expectations particularly well. However, in most of these experiments, the same facial images were used during both the learning and testing phases. This raises the question of whether participants truly recognised the individuals (identity recognition) or merely remembered specific pictorial details. The present experiment investigated whether changing the viewing perspective during the testing phase would yield similar results compared to a control condition using the classical design (i.e., identical facial images during learning and testing). The results revealed a source memory advantage for cheaters in both the changed perspective and the control condition. These findings suggest that participants did not rely solely on pictorial details but were able to recognise the individuals and recall their cheating behaviour.

Memory
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Memory Processes and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.