Evaluation of "Amphixenosis" as a Classification Term for Bidirectional Human–Animal Disease Transmission

The One Health concept emphasizes the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health, yet terminology describing bidirectional infectious disease transmission between humans and animals remains inconsistent. Researchers use various terms to describe bidirectional human–animal disease transmission, many of which are broad, directionally ambiguous, event-specific, or descriptive rather than classificatory. Drawing on published literature, this perspective examines whether the designation “amphixenosis” could serve as a classification term for such transmission systems by comparing it with existing terminology, discussing representative examples, proposing a conceptual definition, and considering its potential advantages, limitations, and applications. Rather than recommending immediate adoption or replacement of preexisting terms, this perspective aims to encourage discussion on whether more consistent terminology could improve conceptual clarity, communication, terminological consistency, literature retrieval, and disease classification within One Health.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20759132
Primary Topic
Zoonotic diseases and public health
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Evaluation of "Amphixenosis" as a Classification Term for Bidirectional Human–Animal Disease Transmission

Elijah Marquez
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Zoonotic diseases and public health
preprint

Evaluation of "Amphixenosis" as a Classification Term for Bidirectional Human–Animal Disease Transmission

Elijah Marquez
preprint en

Abstract

The One Health concept emphasizes the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health, yet terminology describing bidirectional infectious disease transmission between humans and animals remains inconsistent. Researchers use various terms to describe bidirectional human–animal disease transmission, many of which are broad, directionally ambiguous, event-specific, or descriptive rather than classificatory. Drawing on published literature, this perspective examines whether the designation “amphixenosis” could serve as a classification term for such transmission systems by comparing it with existing terminology, discussing representative examples, proposing a conceptual definition, and considering its potential advantages, limitations, and applications. Rather than recommending immediate adoption or replacement of preexisting terms, this perspective aims to encourage discussion on whether more consistent terminology could improve conceptual clarity, communication, terminological consistency, literature retrieval, and disease classification within One Health.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Zoonotic diseases and public health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.