Biomarkers in Melanoma: Updates in Prognosis and Management

Melanoma incidence rates have also been steadily increasing, emphasizing the need for improved prognostic and diagnostic tools with the goal of enhancing patients’ outcomes. Biomarkers in melanoma have emerged as an important component of melanoma management, offering insight into disease progression, tumor biology, and the potential for judging treatment responses. Traditionally, blood and immunohistochemical markers such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), S100 calcium-binding protein (S100B), human melanoma black-45 (HMB-45), and SRY-box transcription factor 10 (SOX10) have been widely used in melanoma diagnosis, staging, and monitoring. However, their clinical use has been limited because of their low specificity, especially in patients with early-stage disease. This has led to the development of molecular and genetic biomarkers, including BRAF, NRAS, and KIT mutations, which improved patients’ risk stratification and enabled targeted therapies, and gene expression signature assays such as DecisionDx (Castle Biosciences) and SkylineDx (Merlin) that are already used in clinics to help with surgical decisions and to assess patients’ prognosis. Other circulating biomarkers, including microRNAs, circulating tumor DNA and circulating tumor cells, have been developed to provide minimally invasive approaches to monitor tumor evolution and detect recurrence. However, none of these new approaches are used in clinics due to their low specificity and/or sensitivity. Additionally, nomograms or predictive models have been created using biomarkers and clinicopathologic data to assess patients’ outcomes and survival. While significant progress has been made, the integration of melanoma biomarkers into routine clinical practice remains limited. This review summarizes current advancements in melanoma biomarkers, including traditional serum and immunohistochemical markers, as well as developments in molecular, genetic, circulating, and predictive biomarker approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18121992
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomarkers in Melanoma: Updates in Prognosis and Management

Richard Essner, Brett Crosby, Kristel Lourdault, Benjamin Linza et al.
Cancers
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
article

Biomarkers in Melanoma: Updates in Prognosis and Management

Richard Essner, Brett Crosby, Kristel Lourdault, Benjamin Linza, Martin Guerra, Alyssa Crosby
article en

Abstract

Melanoma incidence rates have also been steadily increasing, emphasizing the need for improved prognostic and diagnostic tools with the goal of enhancing patients’ outcomes. Biomarkers in melanoma have emerged as an important component of melanoma management, offering insight into disease progression, tumor biology, and the potential for judging treatment responses. Traditionally, blood and immunohistochemical markers such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), S100 calcium-binding protein (S100B), human melanoma black-45 (HMB-45), and SRY-box transcription factor 10 (SOX10) have been widely used in melanoma diagnosis, staging, and monitoring. However, their clinical use has been limited because of their low specificity, especially in patients with early-stage disease. This has led to the development of molecular and genetic biomarkers, including BRAF, NRAS, and KIT mutations, which improved patients’ risk stratification and enabled targeted therapies, and gene expression signature assays such as DecisionDx (Castle Biosciences) and SkylineDx (Merlin) that are already used in clinics to help with surgical decisions and to assess patients’ prognosis. Other circulating biomarkers, including microRNAs, circulating tumor DNA and circulating tumor cells, have been developed to provide minimally invasive approaches to monitor tumor evolution and detect recurrence. However, none of these new approaches are used in clinics due to their low specificity and/or sensitivity. Additionally, nomograms or predictive models have been created using biomarkers and clinicopathologic data to assess patients’ outcomes and survival. While significant progress has been made, the integration of melanoma biomarkers into routine clinical practice remains limited. This review summarizes current advancements in melanoma biomarkers, including traditional serum and immunohistochemical markers, as well as developments in molecular, genetic, circulating, and predictive biomarker approaches.

CancersVol. 18(12)
Saint John's Health Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.