A phase I study evaluating subcutaneous administration of the monoclonal antibody programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor cetrelimab (JNJ-63723283) in patients with advanced solid malignancies

PURPOSE: Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of subcutaneous cetrelimab were assessed in Parts (P)3 and 4 of the phase I LUC1001 study in patients with advanced/refractory solid tumors who progressed on or wereineligible for standard treatment and had no prior PD-1/PD-L1/PD-L2 treatment. METHODS: In P3, low-concentration cetrelimab (30 mg/mL) was administered subcutaneously at 600 mg with a 6-week interval between doses 1 and 2, then every 3 weeks (Q3W). Based on P3 pharmacokinetic and safety findings, high-concentration cetrelimab (150 mg/mL) was administered subcutaneously at a 900 mg loading dose followed by 600 mg Q3W in P4. RESULTS: Among 30 enrolled patients (P3, n = 11; P4, n = 19), median age was 54.5y; 76.7% received ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy. Median duration of treatment was 2.1mo. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 70% of patients, including 23.3% with grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs and 30.0% immune-related AEs; no treatment-related serious AEs or systemic infusion-related reactions occurred. After 3.7mo median follow-up, 2 patients (6.7%) achieved durable responses and 4 patients (13.3%) had stable disease for ≥ 24 weeks. Pharmacokinetic data showed that adding a 900 mg loading dose to the 600 mg Q3W subcutaneous regimen shortened the time to reach target recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) exposures, making it a suitable intravenous alternative. Maximum PD-1 receptor occupancy was achieved with both formulations. Anti-cetrelimab antibodies were detected in 4 patients (13.3%); none were neutralizing. CONCLUSIONS: RP2D of subcutaneous cetrelimab was established as a loading dose of 900 mg followed by 600 mg Q3W. Subcutaneous cetrelimab demonstrated characteristics consistent with prior characterization of intravenous cetrelimab. Trial registration NCT02908906 at ClinicalTrials.gov, September 21, 2016; EudraCT 2016-002,017-22 at clinicaltrialsregister.eu, Jan 11, 2017.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-026-04457-1
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A phase I study evaluating subcutaneous administration of the monoclonal antibody programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor cetrelimab (JNJ-63723283) in patients with advanced solid malignancies

Iurie Bulat, Vinod Philip, Peter Hellemans, Daniel Jonathan et al.
Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

A phase I study evaluating subcutaneous administration of the monoclonal antibody programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor cetrelimab (JNJ-63723283) in patients with advanced solid malignancies

Iurie Bulat, Vinod Philip, Peter Hellemans, Daniel Jonathan, Aitana Calvo, Fiona Thistlethwaite, Dariusz M. Kowalski, Shalaka Hampras, Angela Girvin, Sydney Akapeme, Piotr Rutkowski, John Loffredo, Douglas Steinbach, Victor Moreno, Ruth Plummer
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of subcutaneous cetrelimab were assessed in Parts (P)3 and 4 of the phase I LUC1001 study in patients with advanced/refractory solid tumors who progressed on or wereineligible for standard treatment and had no prior PD-1/PD-L1/PD-L2 treatment. METHODS: In P3, low-concentration cetrelimab (30 mg/mL) was administered subcutaneously at 600 mg with a 6-week interval between doses 1 and 2, then every 3 weeks (Q3W). Based on P3 pharmacokinetic and safety findings, high-concentration cetrelimab (150 mg/mL) was administered subcutaneously at a 900 mg loading dose followed by 600 mg Q3W in P4. RESULTS: Among 30 enrolled patients (P3, n = 11; P4, n = 19), median age was 54.5y; 76.7% received ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy. Median duration of treatment was 2.1mo. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 70% of patients, including 23.3% with grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs and 30.0% immune-related AEs; no treatment-related serious AEs or systemic infusion-related reactions occurred. After 3.7mo median follow-up, 2 patients (6.7%) achieved durable responses and 4 patients (13.3%) had stable disease for ≥ 24 weeks. Pharmacokinetic data showed that adding a 900 mg loading dose to the 600 mg Q3W subcutaneous regimen shortened the time to reach target recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) exposures, making it a suitable intravenous alternative. Maximum PD-1 receptor occupancy was achieved with both formulations. Anti-cetrelimab antibodies were detected in 4 patients (13.3%); none were neutralizing. CONCLUSIONS: RP2D of subcutaneous cetrelimab was established as a loading dose of 900 mg followed by 600 mg Q3W. Subcutaneous cetrelimab demonstrated characteristics consistent with prior characterization of intravenous cetrelimab. Trial registration NCT02908906 at ClinicalTrials.gov, September 21, 2016; EudraCT 2016-002,017-22 at clinicaltrialsregister.eu, Jan 11, 2017.

Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy
Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US), Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (ES), Institutul Oncologic din Republica Moldova (MD), National Institute of Oncology (HU), Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz (ES), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (GB), The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (PL), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.