Research on Coalbed Gas Separation and Recovery in Coal Medium-Mixed Promoter Systems via Hydrate Technology

Efficient separation and recovery of low-concentration coalbed methane (LCCBM) are vital for energy utilization and greenhouse gas mitigation. However, hydrate-based separation technologies still struggle to balance kinetic performance and separation efficiency. Given coal’s intrinsic affinity for methane, this study explores its synergistic effect with mixed promoters for LCCBM separation. Experiments evaluated the separation of a 25%CH 4 /67%N 2 /8%O 2 mixture at 283.2 K (3 and 7 MPa) using two promoter systems: 5.56% (molar concentration) tetrahydrofuran (THF) and 0.5% (mass concentration) L -tryptophan (L-Trp), 5.56% (molar concentration) cyclopentane (CP) and 0.5% (mass concentration) L-Trp. We investigated four coal particle sizes (M1: 0.90–2.00, M2: 0.43–0.90, M3: 0.25–0.43, M4: 0.18–0.25 mm), using coal-free and 0.08 wt % expanded graphite (EG) systems as controls. The results demonstrate that, compared to the coal-free system, the comprehensive separation performance in both systems was improved. Coal particles altered the gas–liquid–solid interface and hydrate growth pattern, causing nonmonotonic changes in kinetics and separation. In the THF system, coal significantly promoted hydrate growth, the initial rate was approximately 2.84 times higher than that of the coal-free system without causing a decrease in separation performance. In the CP system, CP adsorption by coal slightly decreased the kinetics but significantly enhanced CH 4 selectivity, the methane mole fraction in the hydrate phase increased from 25% to 51.26%. M3 proved optimal, balancing high gas uptake and separation efficiency. While 0.08 wt % EG showed similar trends, coal provided superior enhancements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy & Fuels
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6c01832
Primary Topic
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on Coalbed Gas Separation and Recovery in Coal Medium-Mixed Promoter Systems via Hydrate Technology

Zhenyuan Yin, Qiang Zhang, Minjie Chen, Baoyong Zhang et al.
Energy & Fuels
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
article

Research on Coalbed Gas Separation and Recovery in Coal Medium-Mixed Promoter Systems via Hydrate Technology

Zhenyuan Yin, Qiang Zhang, Minjie Chen, Baoyong Zhang, Ning Yue, Kai Hou, Yong Nie
article en

Abstract

Efficient separation and recovery of low-concentration coalbed methane (LCCBM) are vital for energy utilization and greenhouse gas mitigation. However, hydrate-based separation technologies still struggle to balance kinetic performance and separation efficiency. Given coal’s intrinsic affinity for methane, this study explores its synergistic effect with mixed promoters for LCCBM separation. Experiments evaluated the separation of a 25%CH 4 /67%N 2 /8%O 2 mixture at 283.2 K (3 and 7 MPa) using two promoter systems: 5.56% (molar concentration) tetrahydrofuran (THF) and 0.5% (mass concentration) L -tryptophan (L-Trp), 5.56% (molar concentration) cyclopentane (CP) and 0.5% (mass concentration) L-Trp. We investigated four coal particle sizes (M1: 0.90–2.00, M2: 0.43–0.90, M3: 0.25–0.43, M4: 0.18–0.25 mm), using coal-free and 0.08 wt % expanded graphite (EG) systems as controls. The results demonstrate that, compared to the coal-free system, the comprehensive separation performance in both systems was improved. Coal particles altered the gas–liquid–solid interface and hydrate growth pattern, causing nonmonotonic changes in kinetics and separation. In the THF system, coal significantly promoted hydrate growth, the initial rate was approximately 2.84 times higher than that of the coal-free system without causing a decrease in separation performance. In the CP system, CP adsorption by coal slightly decreased the kinetics but significantly enhanced CH 4 selectivity, the methane mole fraction in the hydrate phase increased from 25% to 51.26%. M3 proved optimal, balancing high gas uptake and separation efficiency. While 0.08 wt % EG showed similar trends, coal provided superior enhancements.

Energy & Fuels
Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology (CN), Technology Holding (United States) (US), Heilongjiang University of Technology (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.