Channels

Channels are often treated as basic conditions affording communication. The anthropological research reviewed here, however, collectively demonstrates that channels are themselves subject to other forces—social, material, and political—and that channels can be deployed to limit or prevent communication. Channels are experienced as specific—as relating specific sentiences under specific conditions, often demanding specific choices. Because channels are vitalized by the specific and multiple sentiences that are connected to or cut out by them, channels both afford and depend on multiple, diverging perspectives. Attending to channels thus brings questions of social relation into relief: We check channels not only for fidelity but also for how they map shifting social locations. When we attend ethnographically not only to how people make, imagine, use, distort, check, block, and rechannel channels but also to who does so, and to what purposes, we discover many points of agency for upholding or changing social orders and infrastructures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Anthropology
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-041524-022740
Primary Topic
Anthropological Studies and Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Channels

Alaina Lemon
Annual Review of Anthropology
Anthropological Studies and Insights
article

Channels

Alaina Lemon
article en

Abstract

Channels are often treated as basic conditions affording communication. The anthropological research reviewed here, however, collectively demonstrates that channels are themselves subject to other forces—social, material, and political—and that channels can be deployed to limit or prevent communication. Channels are experienced as specific—as relating specific sentiences under specific conditions, often demanding specific choices. Because channels are vitalized by the specific and multiple sentiences that are connected to or cut out by them, channels both afford and depend on multiple, diverging perspectives. Attending to channels thus brings questions of social relation into relief: We check channels not only for fidelity but also for how they map shifting social locations. When we attend ethnographically not only to how people make, imagine, use, distort, check, block, and rechannel channels but also to who does so, and to what purposes, we discover many points of agency for upholding or changing social orders and infrastructures.

Annual Review of Anthropology
University of Michigan (US), Michigan Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Anthropological Studies and Insights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.