The Disenfranchised Bereavement: How the Familistic Death Administration Excludes Gay Men in Contemporary China

This article examines research on “disenfranchised bereavement” as a fundamental concept for understanding the bereavement experiences of gay men, drawing upon Zhu Zhe’s account within the Chinese context. It is demonstrated that China’s death administration system is familistic, designating family members from heterosexual marriages as the only legitimate agents, thereby denying same-sex partners the rights to manage after-death arrangements and inherit assets. This family-centered system conflicts with the reality of diverse intimate relationships today, exacerbating the suffering during bereavement. This issue is not unique to same-sex couples but is encountered by all individuals who choose not to adhere to traditional family structures. It cannot be resolved merely by expanding the scope of the marriage and family to include additional groups. We contend that the key to addressing this issue lies in shifting the system’s family-centric bias and embracing a broader range of family relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228261463410
Primary Topic
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Disenfranchised Bereavement: How the Familistic Death Administration Excludes Gay Men in Contemporary China

Ming Wang, Zeyu Huang
OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
article

The Disenfranchised Bereavement: How the Familistic Death Administration Excludes Gay Men in Contemporary China

Ming Wang, Zeyu Huang
article en

Abstract

This article examines research on “disenfranchised bereavement” as a fundamental concept for understanding the bereavement experiences of gay men, drawing upon Zhu Zhe’s account within the Chinese context. It is demonstrated that China’s death administration system is familistic, designating family members from heterosexual marriages as the only legitimate agents, thereby denying same-sex partners the rights to manage after-death arrangements and inherit assets. This family-centered system conflicts with the reality of diverse intimate relationships today, exacerbating the suffering during bereavement. This issue is not unique to same-sex couples but is encountered by all individuals who choose not to adhere to traditional family structures. It cannot be resolved merely by expanding the scope of the marriage and family to include additional groups. We contend that the key to addressing this issue lies in shifting the system’s family-centric bias and embracing a broader range of family relationships.

OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
Zhuhai Institute of Advanced Technology (CN), Renmin University of China (CN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.