Cochlear Implantation and Hearing Rehabilitation in CHARGE Syndrome: Expanding Clinical Knowledge and Outcomes

OBJECTIVE: Characterize patients with CHARGE syndrome (CS) undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) and evaluate factors influencing surgical approaches and outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Quaternary pediatric referral center. PATIENTS: Fifty-five patients with CS aged ≤21 years who underwent CI. INTERVENTION: Demographic, audiologic, radiologic, operative, and postoperative data were reviewed. Outcomes included audiologic performance, device use, communication modality, and the presence of facial nerve stimulation (FNS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgical feasibility, anatomic characteristics, and auditory outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients underwent CI, representing 67 ears. The cohort was 62% male, and 91% had neurodevelopmental impairment. Complete electrode insertion was achieved in 81% of ears (54/67), partial insertion in 5% (3/67), and insertion data were unavailable in 15% (10/67). Perimodiolar electrodes were used in 57% of ears. Imaging demonstrated cochlear nerve aplasia or hypoplasia in 54% of implanted ears and cochlear aperture stenosis in 25%. At analysis, 49% of patients were active CI users, while 27% had discontinued use. Audiologic threshold improvement was observed in 47% of patients, and overall clinical benefit was identified in 64% based on combined audiologic and functional measures. Ipsilateral facial nerve stimulation occurred in 15% of implanted ears; among these, 60% remained active users, while 40% discontinued CI use due to FNS unresponsive to reprogramming. CONCLUSION: CI is feasible and can provide meaningful benefit in patients with CS despite complex anatomic and neurodevelopmental challenges. These findings support an individualized approach to CI candidacy and offer practical guidance for surgical planning and family counseling regarding expected outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Otology & Neurotology
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0000000000004973
Primary Topic
Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cochlear Implantation and Hearing Rehabilitation in CHARGE Syndrome: Expanding Clinical Knowledge and Outcomes

Margaret Kettler, Daniel Choo, Soraya Abdul‐Hadi, Anna Guan et al.
Otology & Neurotology
Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
article

Cochlear Implantation and Hearing Rehabilitation in CHARGE Syndrome: Expanding Clinical Knowledge and Outcomes

Margaret Kettler, Daniel Choo, Soraya Abdul‐Hadi, Anna Guan, John S. Stein, Loga Iyer
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Characterize patients with CHARGE syndrome (CS) undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) and evaluate factors influencing surgical approaches and outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Quaternary pediatric referral center. PATIENTS: Fifty-five patients with CS aged ≤21 years who underwent CI. INTERVENTION: Demographic, audiologic, radiologic, operative, and postoperative data were reviewed. Outcomes included audiologic performance, device use, communication modality, and the presence of facial nerve stimulation (FNS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgical feasibility, anatomic characteristics, and auditory outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients underwent CI, representing 67 ears. The cohort was 62% male, and 91% had neurodevelopmental impairment. Complete electrode insertion was achieved in 81% of ears (54/67), partial insertion in 5% (3/67), and insertion data were unavailable in 15% (10/67). Perimodiolar electrodes were used in 57% of ears. Imaging demonstrated cochlear nerve aplasia or hypoplasia in 54% of implanted ears and cochlear aperture stenosis in 25%. At analysis, 49% of patients were active CI users, while 27% had discontinued use. Audiologic threshold improvement was observed in 47% of patients, and overall clinical benefit was identified in 64% based on combined audiologic and functional measures. Ipsilateral facial nerve stimulation occurred in 15% of implanted ears; among these, 60% remained active users, while 40% discontinued CI use due to FNS unresponsive to reprogramming. CONCLUSION: CI is feasible and can provide meaningful benefit in patients with CS despite complex anatomic and neurodevelopmental challenges. These findings support an individualized approach to CI candidacy and offer practical guidance for surgical planning and family counseling regarding expected outcomes.

Otology & Neurotology
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US), Northeast Ohio Medical University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.