Patient-Centric Drug Delivery: Establishing Injection Hold Time Limits for Large Volume Autoinjectors

Administering large volumes of medication via subcutaneous or intramuscular injection often requires tradeoffs to balance patient comfort with effective therapeutic outcomes. The shift toward patient-centric drug delivery has driven the development of large-volume autoinjectors (LVAI), enabling self-administration of medications outside clinical settings. However, little research has been conducted to establish an upper limit for autoinjector hold time. Therefore, this study seeks to establish an acceptable upper limit of hold time for most users by evaluating the capability of diverse user groups when performing simulated injection tasks. Using a mockup LVAI (>3mL), participants (N=20; Lay, Chronic Condition, Upper-Extremity impaired) completed two trials with two injections each: Trial A, hold as long as possible, and Trial B, hold for 10 minutes. Trials assessed maximum hold times and performance without progress cues. Grip strength, downward injection force, hold time, and subjective responses were recorded. When instructed, lay participants reliably maintained 10-minute injection time. Participants with chronic conditions and upper extremity impairments demonstrated significantly shorter and more variable hold times. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between pre- and postgrip strength, indicating effective fatigue management between trials. Every participant, regardless of group, was able to hold an injection for at least 2 minutes and 18 seconds. Subjective feedback indicated that most participants found 10-minute injections challenging, with a strong indications that durations of 2 minutes or less would be acceptable. Notably, participants were inaccurate in estimating injection duration, with perceived hold times deviating from actual by ~38%. For most users, an acceptable hold time for LVAIs is 2 minutes or less. Longer durations may be feasible but require additional design considerations, such as progress cues, end-of-dose feedback, and ergonomic support, to mitigate physical and mental challenges. Future research should expand to broader populations and balance risk-based factors that can further enhance the development of patient-centric drug delivery systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2026-000008.1
Primary Topic
Intramuscular injections and effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient-Centric Drug Delivery: Establishing Injection Hold Time Limits for Large Volume Autoinjectors

Ankur Kulshrestha, Dana Cabrita, Daniel Miranda
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Intramuscular injections and effects
article

Patient-Centric Drug Delivery: Establishing Injection Hold Time Limits for Large Volume Autoinjectors

Ankur Kulshrestha, Dana Cabrita, Daniel Miranda
article en

Abstract

Administering large volumes of medication via subcutaneous or intramuscular injection often requires tradeoffs to balance patient comfort with effective therapeutic outcomes. The shift toward patient-centric drug delivery has driven the development of large-volume autoinjectors (LVAI), enabling self-administration of medications outside clinical settings. However, little research has been conducted to establish an upper limit for autoinjector hold time. Therefore, this study seeks to establish an acceptable upper limit of hold time for most users by evaluating the capability of diverse user groups when performing simulated injection tasks. Using a mockup LVAI (>3mL), participants (N=20; Lay, Chronic Condition, Upper-Extremity impaired) completed two trials with two injections each: Trial A, hold as long as possible, and Trial B, hold for 10 minutes. Trials assessed maximum hold times and performance without progress cues. Grip strength, downward injection force, hold time, and subjective responses were recorded. When instructed, lay participants reliably maintained 10-minute injection time. Participants with chronic conditions and upper extremity impairments demonstrated significantly shorter and more variable hold times. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between pre- and postgrip strength, indicating effective fatigue management between trials. Every participant, regardless of group, was able to hold an injection for at least 2 minutes and 18 seconds. Subjective feedback indicated that most participants found 10-minute injections challenging, with a strong indications that durations of 2 minutes or less would be acceptable. Notably, participants were inaccurate in estimating injection duration, with perceived hold times deviating from actual by ~38%. For most users, an acceptable hold time for LVAIs is 2 minutes or less. Longer durations may be feasible but require additional design considerations, such as progress cues, end-of-dose feedback, and ergonomic support, to mitigate physical and mental challenges. Future research should expand to broader populations and balance risk-based factors that can further enhance the development of patient-centric drug delivery systems.

PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Bristol-Myers Squibb (Germany) (DE), Bristol-Myers Squibb (Netherlands) (NL), Bristol-Myers Squibb (United Kingdom) (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Intramuscular injections and effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.