A Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Model to Guide Use of Whole-Pelvic Radiation Therapy in Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer: Exploratory Analysis of RTOG 9413

Background/Objectives: This study explored whether a multimodal artificial intelligence (MMAI) model integrating digitized histopathology and clinical features can identify prostate cancer patients who may benefit from neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) and whole-pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT). Methods: This secondary analysis of NRG/RTOG 9413 included NHT-treated patients with digitized biopsy slides and clinical data who were not part of the MMAI model optimization. A previously validated MMAI model estimated long-term risk, and Fine-Gray models evaluated interactions between MMAI-derived scores and the radiation field (WPRT vs. prostate-only RT [PORT]) for biochemical failure (BF), chosen over progression-free survival because of extended follow-up and distant metastasis (DM), with subgroup analyses by predefined MMAI strata. Results: Among 81 eligible patients, the MMAI-by-treatment interaction for BF did not confirm a differential effect (p = 0.30). Therefore, subgroup findings should be interpreted as descriptive and hypothesis-generating. Nevertheless, the magnitude effect of WPRT was numerically greater in the MMAI high-risk subgroup (5-yr: 41% vs. 79%; 10-yr: 47% vs. 79%; aHR 0.35 [0.14–0.86]) than in the low–intermediate group (5-yr: 18% vs. 33%; 10-yr: 44% vs. 57%; aHR 0.66 [0.29–1.48]). Conclusions: Although no statistically significant treatment-by-MMAI interaction was demonstrated, these findings are hypothesis-generating and support further investigation of MMAI approaches for guiding WPRT in NRG/RTOG 0534, 0924, GETUG-01, and POP-RT trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18121982
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Model to Guide Use of Whole-Pelvic Radiation Therapy in Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer: Exploratory Analysis of RTOG 9413

Andrew M. McDonald, Mutlay Sayan, Adam P. Dicker, Elizabeth Gore et al.
Cancers
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

A Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Model to Guide Use of Whole-Pelvic Radiation Therapy in Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer: Exploratory Analysis of RTOG 9413

Andrew M. McDonald, Mutlay Sayan, Adam P. Dicker, Elizabeth Gore, M.A. Hallman, George Daniel Grass, Paul L. Nguyen, Igor J. Barani, Stephanie L. Pugh, J. Daniel Pennington, Erin L. Stewart, Timothy N. Showalter, Mack Roach III, Michael Rooney, I-Chow Hsu, Huei-Chung Huang, Phuoc T. Tran
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This study explored whether a multimodal artificial intelligence (MMAI) model integrating digitized histopathology and clinical features can identify prostate cancer patients who may benefit from neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) and whole-pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT). Methods: This secondary analysis of NRG/RTOG 9413 included NHT-treated patients with digitized biopsy slides and clinical data who were not part of the MMAI model optimization. A previously validated MMAI model estimated long-term risk, and Fine-Gray models evaluated interactions between MMAI-derived scores and the radiation field (WPRT vs. prostate-only RT [PORT]) for biochemical failure (BF), chosen over progression-free survival because of extended follow-up and distant metastasis (DM), with subgroup analyses by predefined MMAI strata. Results: Among 81 eligible patients, the MMAI-by-treatment interaction for BF did not confirm a differential effect (p = 0.30). Therefore, subgroup findings should be interpreted as descriptive and hypothesis-generating. Nevertheless, the magnitude effect of WPRT was numerically greater in the MMAI high-risk subgroup (5-yr: 41% vs. 79%; 10-yr: 47% vs. 79%; aHR 0.35 [0.14–0.86]) than in the low–intermediate group (5-yr: 18% vs. 33%; 10-yr: 44% vs. 57%; aHR 0.66 [0.29–1.48]). Conclusions: Although no statistically significant treatment-by-MMAI interaction was demonstrated, these findings are hypothesis-generating and support further investigation of MMAI approaches for guiding WPRT in NRG/RTOG 0534, 0924, GETUG-01, and POP-RT trials.

CancersVol. 18(12)
Fox Chase Cancer Center (US), St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Thomas Jefferson University (US), The Mount (GB), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Urology of Virginia (US), Milwaukee VA Medical Center (US), University of California San Francisco Medical Center (US), Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center (US), NRG Oncology (US), Artistic Realization Technologies (US), University of Virginia (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.