Livelihood Risks and Management Strategies of Farmers in Flood-Prone Areas: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China

Multiple factors such as global climate warming and environmental degradation have increased natural disaster frequencies, threatening the safety of citizens’ lives and properties seriously. Existing literature primarily focuses on livelihood diversification, resilience, and vulnerability in flood-prone areas, with limited research systematically examining farmers’ livelihood risks and management strategies across multiple dimensions. To address this gap, this study advances the understanding of multidimensional livelihood risks by systematically identifying the key risk perceptions and management strategy choices of farmers, thereby providing empirical evidence essential for designing targeted interventions and sustainable adaptation policies in flood-prone regions. Specifically, this study employs an unordered multinomial logistic model to examine farmers’ risk management strategy choices, drawing on a field survey of 540 farmers from floodplain areas in Sichuan Province, China. The analysis systematically covers four livelihood risk dimensions (health, environmental, financial, social) and five management strategies (expansion, adjustment-oriented, contraction, aid-oriented, dependency-based). The results indicate that: (1) The most significant livelihood risk is environmental, and the most commonly selected risk management strategy is adjustment-oriented management; (2) When farmers face health risks, they tend to adopt dependency-based management strategy; in dealing with financial and social risks, farmers perceive no significant difference in the selection of the five management strategies. Accordingly, targeted strategies are proposed: insurance and information for environmental risks, medical security for health, employment training for social, and income diversification for financial risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18126271
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Livelihood Risks and Management Strategies of Farmers in Flood-Prone Areas: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China

Shanshan Zhao, Wei Liu, Jie Xu, Xi Wang et al.
Sustainability
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Livelihood Risks and Management Strategies of Farmers in Flood-Prone Areas: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China

Shanshan Zhao, Wei Liu, Jie Xu, Xi Wang, Jiahui Tian, Guoxiang Ma
article en

Abstract

Multiple factors such as global climate warming and environmental degradation have increased natural disaster frequencies, threatening the safety of citizens’ lives and properties seriously. Existing literature primarily focuses on livelihood diversification, resilience, and vulnerability in flood-prone areas, with limited research systematically examining farmers’ livelihood risks and management strategies across multiple dimensions. To address this gap, this study advances the understanding of multidimensional livelihood risks by systematically identifying the key risk perceptions and management strategy choices of farmers, thereby providing empirical evidence essential for designing targeted interventions and sustainable adaptation policies in flood-prone regions. Specifically, this study employs an unordered multinomial logistic model to examine farmers’ risk management strategy choices, drawing on a field survey of 540 farmers from floodplain areas in Sichuan Province, China. The analysis systematically covers four livelihood risk dimensions (health, environmental, financial, social) and five management strategies (expansion, adjustment-oriented, contraction, aid-oriented, dependency-based). The results indicate that: (1) The most significant livelihood risk is environmental, and the most commonly selected risk management strategy is adjustment-oriented management; (2) When farmers face health risks, they tend to adopt dependency-based management strategy; in dealing with financial and social risks, farmers perceive no significant difference in the selection of the five management strategies. Accordingly, targeted strategies are proposed: insurance and information for environmental risks, medical security for health, employment training for social, and income diversification for financial risks.

SustainabilityVol. 18(12)
Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology (CN), University of Derby (GB), Xi'an University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.