Session 27. Oral Presentation for: Turning ullage into opportunity: the next chapter in Australia’s LNG story

Presented on 21 May 2026: Session 27 Whilst domestic supply shortages capture media attention, a potential second supply shortage has gone under-reported. Australia’s liquefied natural gas (LNG) industry faces an under-recognised but critical inflection point: many Australian LNG facilities now require systematic backfill planning as foundation fields deplete. Currently, we forecast most plants will begin to experience upstream supply shortfalls in the 2030s, with several approaching end-of-life in the 2040s, under current reserves development scenarios. Securing resources, creating development plans, obtaining approvals, and completing construction in less than a decade presents unprecedented operational and commercial challenges. Further, proposed projects such as Ichthys Train 3, DLNG Train 2, and NTLNG demonstrate continued investment appetite, but will also increase the pressure on existing resource bases required to fill plant capacities. These supply transitions coincide with significant market uncertainties, including potential global LNG oversupply scenarios and depressed pricing. Additionally, Australia’s Safeguard Mechanism demands enhanced CO2 emissions management, with requirements becoming more stringent, and thus more costly, as Australia progresses towards net-zero by 2050. Backfilling existing infrastructure can either offer compelling economics, with improved capital efficiency and reduced risk compared to greenfield developments. Or, if operators are forced to develop lower quality and disadvantaged resource to backfill, this will only intensify decarbonisation pressures and costs. Our analysis comprehensively evaluates ullage opportunities across Australia’s LNG portfolio, examining backfill gas sources, optimal timing for operator decision-making, key challenges, and potential wildcards. We assess whether Australian backfill projects can maintain competitiveness within global investment portfolios, providing strategic insights for increasingly time-sensitive decisions that will determine the industry’s long-term viability. To access the Oral Presentation click ‘Supplementary data’ below. To read the full paper click here

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Energy Producers journal.
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/ep26544
Primary Topic
Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Session 27. Oral Presentation for: Turning ullage into opportunity: the next chapter in Australia’s LNG story

John Gibb
Australian Energy Producers journal.
Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies
article

Session 27. Oral Presentation for: Turning ullage into opportunity: the next chapter in Australia’s LNG story

John Gibb
article en

Abstract

Presented on 21 May 2026: Session 27 Whilst domestic supply shortages capture media attention, a potential second supply shortage has gone under-reported. Australia’s liquefied natural gas (LNG) industry faces an under-recognised but critical inflection point: many Australian LNG facilities now require systematic backfill planning as foundation fields deplete. Currently, we forecast most plants will begin to experience upstream supply shortfalls in the 2030s, with several approaching end-of-life in the 2040s, under current reserves development scenarios. Securing resources, creating development plans, obtaining approvals, and completing construction in less than a decade presents unprecedented operational and commercial challenges. Further, proposed projects such as Ichthys Train 3, DLNG Train 2, and NTLNG demonstrate continued investment appetite, but will also increase the pressure on existing resource bases required to fill plant capacities. These supply transitions coincide with significant market uncertainties, including potential global LNG oversupply scenarios and depressed pricing. Additionally, Australia’s Safeguard Mechanism demands enhanced CO2 emissions management, with requirements becoming more stringent, and thus more costly, as Australia progresses towards net-zero by 2050. Backfilling existing infrastructure can either offer compelling economics, with improved capital efficiency and reduced risk compared to greenfield developments. Or, if operators are forced to develop lower quality and disadvantaged resource to backfill, this will only intensify decarbonisation pressures and costs. Our analysis comprehensively evaluates ullage opportunities across Australia’s LNG portfolio, examining backfill gas sources, optimal timing for operator decision-making, key challenges, and potential wildcards. We assess whether Australian backfill projects can maintain competitiveness within global investment portfolios, providing strategic insights for increasingly time-sensitive decisions that will determine the industry’s long-term viability. To access the Oral Presentation click ‘Supplementary data’ below. To read the full paper click here

Australian Energy Producers journal.Vol. 66(S2)
Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (BR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Session 27. Oral Presentation for: Turning ullage into opportunity: the next chapter in Australia’s LNG story — John Gibb · Australian Energy Producers journal. (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS