Needles in a haystack: using expert opinion and scientific consensus to guide management of Swift Parrot habitat in coastal New South Wales

The use of scientific consensus, informed by available evidence, is a method that can be used to identify the conservation requirements for threatened species. Drawing on expert knowledge, we examined questions relating to the management and conservation of the critically endangered Swift Parrot (Lathamus discolor). The questions focused on the coastal forests of New South Wales (NSW), where habitat is under high development pressure. A questionnaire was sent to a panel of experts, and responses were discussed until a consensus was reached. From our discussion, we considered that habitat for the Swift Parrot in coastal NSW is well understood and that the species often occurs in isolated trees or small patches. Negative consequences of competitive exclusion by the Noisy Miner (Manorina melanocephala) and Rainbow Lorikeet (Trichoglossus moluccanus) were noted. We recommend that habitat loss from development is avoided as much as possible, with less reliance on mitigation and offsetting. Government impact assessment material, including habitat maps require updating to incorporate current scientific data and to enable the effective monitoring and evaluation of cumulative impacts. If impacts are unavoidable, ecological offsets must provide a net benefit to the species by protecting and expanding habitats at high risk of decline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Zoology
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/zo26002
Primary Topic
Environmental Conservation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Needles in a haystack: using expert opinion and scientific consensus to guide management of Swift Parrot habitat in coastal New South Wales

Jed Field, Chad T. Beranek, Christopher M. McLean, Dejan Stojanović et al.
Australian Journal of Zoology
Environmental Conservation and Management
article

Needles in a haystack: using expert opinion and scientific consensus to guide management of Swift Parrot habitat in coastal New South Wales

Jed Field, Chad T. Beranek, Christopher M. McLean, Dejan Stojanović, D. A. Saunders, Stephen Debus, Matthew Hingee, Nicholas Carson, Ross Crates
article en

Abstract

The use of scientific consensus, informed by available evidence, is a method that can be used to identify the conservation requirements for threatened species. Drawing on expert knowledge, we examined questions relating to the management and conservation of the critically endangered Swift Parrot (Lathamus discolor). The questions focused on the coastal forests of New South Wales (NSW), where habitat is under high development pressure. A questionnaire was sent to a panel of experts, and responses were discussed until a consensus was reached. From our discussion, we considered that habitat for the Swift Parrot in coastal NSW is well understood and that the species often occurs in isolated trees or small patches. Negative consequences of competitive exclusion by the Noisy Miner (Manorina melanocephala) and Rainbow Lorikeet (Trichoglossus moluccanus) were noted. We recommend that habitat loss from development is avoided as much as possible, with less reliance on mitigation and offsetting. Government impact assessment material, including habitat maps require updating to incorporate current scientific data and to enable the effective monitoring and evaluation of cumulative impacts. If impacts are unavoidable, ecological offsets must provide a net benefit to the species by protecting and expanding habitats at high risk of decline.

Australian Journal of ZoologyVol. 74(4)
Australian National University (AU), University of Canberra (AU), Gold Coast City Council (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU), University of New England (AU)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Environmental Conservation and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.