Interlaboratory Comparison and Analysis of Bidirectional Scattering Coefficients for Various Surfaces

Accurate modeling of acoustic scattering is essential for realistic sound-propagation simulations in architectural environments. Traditional random-incidence models fail to represent directional scattering from structured surfaces, motivating the need for detailed bidirectional datasets. A reproducibility analysis of random-incidence and bidirectional scattering coefficient (BSC) measurements was conducted across two laboratories (RWTH Aachen University and The University of Sydney) using different free-field setups and two control surfaces—a 1D-sinusoidal and a 2D-rectangular profile. Measurements were compared with diffuse-field measurements (ISO 17497-1) and numerical simulations replicating the physical setups. Both laboratories produced consistent random-incidence scattering coefficients and BSCs for the 1D-sinusoidal surface. The 2D-rectangular surface showed larger deviations, attributed to edge effects and setup differences. Additional surfaces—including singular objects, random and modular geometries, and small-scale building façade elements—were measured or simulated. The method reliably captures directional scattering across various surface types. Setup geometry, edge effects, and signal-to-noise ratio were identified as key accuracy factors. The resulting coefficients together with its surface and setup descriptions provide a standardized foundation for future acoustic simulations and architectural applications.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2026060/pdf
Primary Topic
Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interlaboratory Comparison and Analysis of Bidirectional Scattering Coefficients for Various Surfaces

Jonothan Holmes, Sigrid Brell‐Çokcan, Anne Heimes, Dagmar Reinhardt et al.
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
article

Interlaboratory Comparison and Analysis of Bidirectional Scattering Coefficients for Various Surfaces

Jonothan Holmes, Sigrid Brell‐Çokcan, Anne Heimes, Dagmar Reinhardt, Densil Cabrera, Iremnur Tokac Celikyay, Michael Vorländer
article en

Abstract

Accurate modeling of acoustic scattering is essential for realistic sound-propagation simulations in architectural environments. Traditional random-incidence models fail to represent directional scattering from structured surfaces, motivating the need for detailed bidirectional datasets. A reproducibility analysis of random-incidence and bidirectional scattering coefficient (BSC) measurements was conducted across two laboratories (RWTH Aachen University and The University of Sydney) using different free-field setups and two control surfaces—a 1D-sinusoidal and a 2D-rectangular profile. Measurements were compared with diffuse-field measurements (ISO 17497-1) and numerical simulations replicating the physical setups. Both laboratories produced consistent random-incidence scattering coefficients and BSCs for the 1D-sinusoidal surface. The 2D-rectangular surface showed larger deviations, attributed to edge effects and setup differences. Additional surfaces—including singular objects, random and modular geometries, and small-scale building façade elements—were measured or simulated. The method reliably captures directional scattering across various surface types. Setup geometry, edge effects, and signal-to-noise ratio were identified as key accuracy factors. The resulting coefficients together with its surface and setup descriptions provide a standardized foundation for future acoustic simulations and architectural applications.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.