Sex‐Related Differences in Maximum Bite Force, Occlusal Contact Area and Bite Pressure in Healthy Young Asian Adults

ABSTRACT Background Maximum bite force (MBF), occlusal contact area (OCA) and bite pressure (BP) are important indicators of occlusal function; however, protocol‐specific data describing their regional and single‐tooth distribution in healthy young Asian adults remain limited. Objective To describe the distribution of MBF, OCA and BP in healthy young adults; to examine sex‐related differences in these parameters; and to analyse the association between MBF and OCA. Methods A cross‐sectional study was conducted with 101 healthy young adults, including 51 males (mean age: 25.71 ± 3.02 years) and 50 females (mean age: 24.49 ± 2.68 years). Maximum, regional, and single‐tooth bite force, together with the corresponding OCA, were measured using the Teetester bite force analyser. BP was subsequently calculated as force per unit occlusal contact area. Data distribution was assessed using the Kolmogorov—Smirnov test, and sex‐related differences were evaluated using appropriate parametric or non‐parametric tests. The association between MBF and OCA was examined using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, and a regression model was constructed to estimate MBF from OCA. Results No significant sex differences were found in total MBF, OCA or BP values ( p > 0.05). In both sexes, the highest values occurred at the first molars and the lowest at the lateral incisors. Regional analysis showed significantly greater posterior OCA and corresponding higher MBF in males ( p < 0.05), whereas the anterior regions showed no significant sex differences ( p > 0.05). A linear regression model was established: MBF ( N ) = −333.68 + 2.65 × OCA (mm 2 ), with OCA explaining 68.0% of the variance in MBF ( R 2 = 0.680, p < 0.001). Conclusion Total MBF, OCA, and BP were comparable between sexes in this cohort of healthy young adults; however, regional and single‐tooth distribution patterns showed subtle sex‐related differences. OCA was strongly associated with MBF and may serve as an important biomechanical indicator of occlusal function under the present measurement protocol. Clinical Significance These findings provide preliminary, protocol—specific normative estimates of MBF, OCA and BP distribution in healthy young Asian adults. They may offer comparative data for future studies on occlusal function, restorative treatment planning and intelligent occlusal analysis systems. Trial Registration Clinical Trial Registration No.: ChiCTR2500097064

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.70241
Primary Topic
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex‐Related Differences in Maximum Bite Force, Occlusal Contact Area and Bite Pressure in Healthy Young Asian Adults

Xiaofeng Qin, Hao Li, Lili Zhang, Ziyi Yang et al.
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
article

Sex‐Related Differences in Maximum Bite Force, Occlusal Contact Area and Bite Pressure in Healthy Young Asian Adults

Xiaofeng Qin, Hao Li, Lili Zhang, Ziyi Yang, Na Yu, N H Creugers, Lili Luo, Chi Wan Lim
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Maximum bite force (MBF), occlusal contact area (OCA) and bite pressure (BP) are important indicators of occlusal function; however, protocol‐specific data describing their regional and single‐tooth distribution in healthy young Asian adults remain limited. Objective To describe the distribution of MBF, OCA and BP in healthy young adults; to examine sex‐related differences in these parameters; and to analyse the association between MBF and OCA. Methods A cross‐sectional study was conducted with 101 healthy young adults, including 51 males (mean age: 25.71 ± 3.02 years) and 50 females (mean age: 24.49 ± 2.68 years). Maximum, regional, and single‐tooth bite force, together with the corresponding OCA, were measured using the Teetester bite force analyser. BP was subsequently calculated as force per unit occlusal contact area. Data distribution was assessed using the Kolmogorov—Smirnov test, and sex‐related differences were evaluated using appropriate parametric or non‐parametric tests. The association between MBF and OCA was examined using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, and a regression model was constructed to estimate MBF from OCA. Results No significant sex differences were found in total MBF, OCA or BP values ( p > 0.05). In both sexes, the highest values occurred at the first molars and the lowest at the lateral incisors. Regional analysis showed significantly greater posterior OCA and corresponding higher MBF in males ( p < 0.05), whereas the anterior regions showed no significant sex differences ( p > 0.05). A linear regression model was established: MBF ( N ) = −333.68 + 2.65 × OCA (mm 2 ), with OCA explaining 68.0% of the variance in MBF ( R 2 = 0.680, p < 0.001). Conclusion Total MBF, OCA, and BP were comparable between sexes in this cohort of healthy young adults; however, regional and single‐tooth distribution patterns showed subtle sex‐related differences. OCA was strongly associated with MBF and may serve as an important biomechanical indicator of occlusal function under the present measurement protocol. Clinical Significance These findings provide preliminary, protocol—specific normative estimates of MBF, OCA and BP distribution in healthy young Asian adults. They may offer comparative data for future studies on occlusal function, restorative treatment planning and intelligent occlusal analysis systems. Trial Registration Clinical Trial Registration No.: ChiCTR2500097064

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), SingHealth (SG), Guangxi Medical University (CN), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Institute of High Performance Computing (SG), Virtual Reality Medical Center (US), Duke-NUS Medical School (SG), Stomatology Hospital (CN), National Dental Centre of Singapore (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.