Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes in Twin Pregnancies Based on Chorionicity: A Systematic Review of ART-Conceived Monochorionic vs. Dichorionic Twins

Background: Assisted reproductive technology (ART) is increasingly utilized worldwide, and approximately 30% of ART pregnancies result in twin gestations. Chorionicity strongly influences perinatal risk, yet its specific impact on ART-conceived twins has not been systematically clarified. Objective: To compare obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in assisted ART-conceived monochorionic (MC) versus dichorionic (DC) twin pregnancies and evaluate the impact of chorionicity on maternal and perinatal outcomes. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024600292). PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through October 2024 for studies comparing obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in ART-conceived monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies. Eligible studies were qualitatively synthesized. Results: Thirty-five studies comprising 15,648 ART-conceived twin pregnancies were included, including 371 monochorionic and 15,277 dichorionic pregnancies. MC pregnancies consistently demonstrated less favorable perinatal outcomes compared with DC pregnancies, including an earlier gestational age at delivery, increased prematurity, lower birth weight, and higher rates of perinatal mortality. By contrast, maternal complications, such as hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes mellitus, PROM, and cesarean delivery, varied considerably across the studies without a consistent association with chorionicity. The baseline maternal characteristics were generally comparable between the groups. Conclusion: Monochorionicity in ART-conceived twin pregnancies is associated with increased adverse neonatal and perinatal outcomes, particularly prematurity and perinatal mortality, while maternal outcomes appear less clearly influenced by chorionicity. Standardized prospective studies are needed to further clarify the chorionicity-specific risks in ART twin pregnancies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124761
Primary Topic
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes in Twin Pregnancies Based on Chorionicity: A Systematic Review of ART-Conceived Monochorionic vs. Dichorionic Twins

Nazila Heidari, Zahra Karimizadeh, Atieh Karimzadeh, Amirali Kalantari et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
article

Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes in Twin Pregnancies Based on Chorionicity: A Systematic Review of ART-Conceived Monochorionic vs. Dichorionic Twins

Nazila Heidari, Zahra Karimizadeh, Atieh Karimzadeh, Amirali Kalantari, Leila Allahqoli, İbrahim Alkatout, Shahdad Farokhmanesh, Sepehr Ramezanipour, Samira Parviziomran
article en

Abstract

Background: Assisted reproductive technology (ART) is increasingly utilized worldwide, and approximately 30% of ART pregnancies result in twin gestations. Chorionicity strongly influences perinatal risk, yet its specific impact on ART-conceived twins has not been systematically clarified. Objective: To compare obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in assisted ART-conceived monochorionic (MC) versus dichorionic (DC) twin pregnancies and evaluate the impact of chorionicity on maternal and perinatal outcomes. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024600292). PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through October 2024 for studies comparing obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in ART-conceived monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies. Eligible studies were qualitatively synthesized. Results: Thirty-five studies comprising 15,648 ART-conceived twin pregnancies were included, including 371 monochorionic and 15,277 dichorionic pregnancies. MC pregnancies consistently demonstrated less favorable perinatal outcomes compared with DC pregnancies, including an earlier gestational age at delivery, increased prematurity, lower birth weight, and higher rates of perinatal mortality. By contrast, maternal complications, such as hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes mellitus, PROM, and cesarean delivery, varied considerably across the studies without a consistent association with chorionicity. The baseline maternal characteristics were generally comparable between the groups. Conclusion: Monochorionicity in ART-conceived twin pregnancies is associated with increased adverse neonatal and perinatal outcomes, particularly prematurity and perinatal mortality, while maternal outcomes appear less clearly influenced by chorionicity. Standardized prospective studies are needed to further clarify the chorionicity-specific risks in ART twin pregnancies.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(12)
Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR), Cyprus International University (CY), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE), Fasa University of Medical Sciences (IR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR), University of Lübeck (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.