A Single Member State Only? The Exclusive Effect of Conflict Rules in EU Social Security Law

The article examines the scope and limits of the single-state principle in EU social security law. Article 11(1) of Regulation 883/2004 provides that a person shall be subject to the legislation of ‘a single Member State only’. This is commonly understood to give the conflict rules in Title II exclusive effect, designating one competent Member State whose legislation applies to the exclusion of all others. The article submits, first, that precluding non-competent Member States from granting benefits exceeds what is necessary to ensure freedom of movement for workers under Article 48 TFEU. Second, drawing a distinction between the powers of national authorities and the rights of individuals, the article argues that while non-competent Member States may not levy compulsory contributions on individuals subject to the legislation of another Member State, individuals may still claim benefits under national law, applied in accordance with applicable EU law. Third, the article rejects an expansive interpretation of the Treaty provisions on freedom of movement that would require non-competent Member States to grant contributory benefits to persons over whom they lack the power to levy contributions. EU law permits – but does not require – non-competent Member States to provide protection to persons not subject to their legislation under Regulation 883/2004.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263x261458616
Primary Topic
European Law and Migration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Single Member State Only? The Exclusive Effect of Conflict Rules in EU Social Security Law

Per Silnes Tandberg
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
European Law and Migration
article

A Single Member State Only? The Exclusive Effect of Conflict Rules in EU Social Security Law

Per Silnes Tandberg
article en

Abstract

The article examines the scope and limits of the single-state principle in EU social security law. Article 11(1) of Regulation 883/2004 provides that a person shall be subject to the legislation of ‘a single Member State only’. This is commonly understood to give the conflict rules in Title II exclusive effect, designating one competent Member State whose legislation applies to the exclusion of all others. The article submits, first, that precluding non-competent Member States from granting benefits exceeds what is necessary to ensure freedom of movement for workers under Article 48 TFEU. Second, drawing a distinction between the powers of national authorities and the rights of individuals, the article argues that while non-competent Member States may not levy compulsory contributions on individuals subject to the legislation of another Member State, individuals may still claim benefits under national law, applied in accordance with applicable EU law. Third, the article rejects an expansive interpretation of the Treaty provisions on freedom of movement that would require non-competent Member States to grant contributory benefits to persons over whom they lack the power to levy contributions. EU law permits – but does not require – non-competent Member States to provide protection to persons not subject to their legislation under Regulation 883/2004.

Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
University of Oslo (NO)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
European Law and Migration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.