Regenerative Potential of Platelet-Rich Plasma-Loaded Scaffolds in Endometrial Damage: A Meta-Analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP)-loaded scaffolds for endometrial regeneration in preclinical in vivo models. Endometrial damage, manifesting as endometrial thinning or adhesion formation within the uterine cavity, is a major cause of infertility. While PRP is a promising regenerative therapy, its short half-life limits its effectiveness. The hypothesis was that combining PRP with a hydrogel-based scaffold would provide sustained growth factor release and improve regenerative outcomes compared with monotherapies. The review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251004274). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was carried out through April 2025. Seven studies in rodent models met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis demonstrated that PRP/scaffold combinations significantly enhanced key outcomes over untreated controls, including endometrial thickness (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 2.85, p < 0.001), gland density (SMD = 4.11, p < 0.001), angiogenesis (SMD = 6.13, p < 0.001), fibrosis reduction (SMD = −5.21, p < 0.001), and embryo implantation rates (SMD = 4.04, p < 0.001). Injectable hydrogels were particularly effective. Compared with PRP alone, the PRP/hydrogels demonstrated improved performance across the majority of structural and functional parameters, though statistical significance varied, partly attributable to variability in scaffold materials and PRP preparation methods. These results suggest that PRP-loaded scaffolds represent a promising approach for improving both structural and functional endometrial regeneration. The therapeutic success is closely tied to the scaffold’s degradation kinetics and its ability to preserve PRP bioactivity. This evidence supports the further development of standardized, degradable PRP-scaffold systems for clinical translation in treating endometrial infertility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tissue Engineering Part B Reviews
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19373368261448723
Primary Topic
Gynecological conditions and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regenerative Potential of Platelet-Rich Plasma-Loaded Scaffolds in Endometrial Damage: A Meta-Analysis

Parvin Bastani Alamdari, Seyedeh‐Tarlan Mirzohreh, Michael R. Doran, Yalda Jahanbani et al.
Tissue Engineering Part B Reviews
Gynecological conditions and treatments
article

Regenerative Potential of Platelet-Rich Plasma-Loaded Scaffolds in Endometrial Damage: A Meta-Analysis

Parvin Bastani Alamdari, Seyedeh‐Tarlan Mirzohreh, Michael R. Doran, Yalda Jahanbani, M Kamali Dehghan, Zohreh Mohammadi, Armin Imanzadeh Ghazijahani, Soodabeh Davaran
article en

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP)-loaded scaffolds for endometrial regeneration in preclinical in vivo models. Endometrial damage, manifesting as endometrial thinning or adhesion formation within the uterine cavity, is a major cause of infertility. While PRP is a promising regenerative therapy, its short half-life limits its effectiveness. The hypothesis was that combining PRP with a hydrogel-based scaffold would provide sustained growth factor release and improve regenerative outcomes compared with monotherapies. The review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251004274). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was carried out through April 2025. Seven studies in rodent models met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis demonstrated that PRP/scaffold combinations significantly enhanced key outcomes over untreated controls, including endometrial thickness (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 2.85, p < 0.001), gland density (SMD = 4.11, p < 0.001), angiogenesis (SMD = 6.13, p < 0.001), fibrosis reduction (SMD = −5.21, p < 0.001), and embryo implantation rates (SMD = 4.04, p < 0.001). Injectable hydrogels were particularly effective. Compared with PRP alone, the PRP/hydrogels demonstrated improved performance across the majority of structural and functional parameters, though statistical significance varied, partly attributable to variability in scaffold materials and PRP preparation methods. These results suggest that PRP-loaded scaffolds represent a promising approach for improving both structural and functional endometrial regeneration. The therapeutic success is closely tied to the scaffold’s degradation kinetics and its ability to preserve PRP bioactivity. This evidence supports the further development of standardized, degradable PRP-scaffold systems for clinical translation in treating endometrial infertility.

Tissue Engineering Part B Reviews
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (IR), University of America (US), Synthetic Biologics (United States) (US), Catholic University of America (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gynecological conditions and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.