Clinical Outcomes of Immunosuppressant drugs in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

Objectives: To systematically evaluate the impact of immunosuppressant drugs (ISDs) use on clinical outcomes in patients with cancer treated with Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Eligible studies reporting overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS), among adult cancer patients receiving ICIs stratified by the use of ISDs. Results: A total of 33 studies with 34,063 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analyses showed significantly worse outcomes among patients receiving ISDs during ICI therapy, with poorer OS (HR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.10–1.56; p = 0.003) and PFS (HR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.10–1.76; p = 0.006) compared with those who did not receive ISDs with high heterogeneity of (I² ~80–85%). In subgroup analysis, patients with non–small-cell lung cancer exhibited significantly reduced OS associated with the use of ISDs. Conclusions: The results suggest an association between ISDs use and reduced OS and PFS in patients with cancer receiving ICI treatment. These findings highlight the need for precision-based immune-related adverse events (irAE) management strategies that balance toxicity control with preservation of therapeutic benefit.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Principles and Practice
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000553094
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Outcomes of Immunosuppressant drugs in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

Seham Khashwayn, Manar Alomar, Jaffar A. Al‐Tawfiq, Lamia K. Alshamlani et al.
Medical Principles and Practice
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Clinical Outcomes of Immunosuppressant drugs in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

Seham Khashwayn, Manar Alomar, Jaffar A. Al‐Tawfiq, Lamia K. Alshamlani, Nora S. Almutairi, Kanan Alshammari, Faizah M. Alotaibi, Sara M. Alrowaydan
article en

Abstract

Objectives: To systematically evaluate the impact of immunosuppressant drugs (ISDs) use on clinical outcomes in patients with cancer treated with Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Eligible studies reporting overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS), among adult cancer patients receiving ICIs stratified by the use of ISDs. Results: A total of 33 studies with 34,063 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analyses showed significantly worse outcomes among patients receiving ISDs during ICI therapy, with poorer OS (HR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.10–1.56; p = 0.003) and PFS (HR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.10–1.76; p = 0.006) compared with those who did not receive ISDs with high heterogeneity of (I² ~80–85%). In subgroup analysis, patients with non–small-cell lung cancer exhibited significantly reduced OS associated with the use of ISDs. Conclusions: The results suggest an association between ISDs use and reduced OS and PFS in patients with cancer receiving ICI treatment. These findings highlight the need for precision-based immune-related adverse events (irAE) management strategies that balance toxicity control with preservation of therapeutic benefit.

Medical Principles and Practice
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.