Tool for Converting ADHD Rating Scales Scores Based on Individual Participant Data from 53 Randomized Controlled Trials of ADHD Medications

Introduction: A variety of rating scales are currently being used to assess symptom severity and quantify symptoms change in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) research and clinical practice. This poses difficulties in interpreting scores from different scales in clinical practice and synthesizing data from studies using different scales. We aimed to develop algorithms for converting scores across the ADHD scales most often used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ADHD medications in children/adolescents and adults, and to develop an online tool for implementing the algorithms. Methods: We analyzed individual participant data from RCTs of ADHD medications (32 RCTs in children/adolescents, 21 in adults), with data on at least two scales per participant at the same timepoint. We applied a series of competing models, that is, univariable and multivariable regression, random forests, and an equipercentile linkage approach, to link pairs of scales. To assess the error of the linking procedure and identify the optimal model, we calculated the median absolute error and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> of all approaches by comparing the values predicted from the models to the observed ones. We subsequently developed a tool to implement the best algorithms. Results: We linked six commonly used ADHD scales, such as the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS-IV; investigator-rated) and the Conners’ Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-R:S). Spline models most frequently yielded the lowest prediction error, outperforming alternative conversion algorithms for absolute scores in 6 out of 12 univariable models and 8 out of 12 multivariable models. The tool for scores conversion is available at ADHD_Scale_Conversion_Tool . Conclusions: Our linkage algorithms enable the comparison and harmonization of findings across studies using different ADHD rating scales. Translating scores across scales improves the interpretability of research findings, facilitates future evidence synthesis across studies, and may support clinical practice. Our online tool supports the practical uptake of our results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10445463261461541
Primary Topic
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tool for Converting ADHD Rating Scales Scores Based on Individual Participant Data from 53 Randomized Controlled Trials of ADHD Medications

Anneka Tomlinson, Christos Christogiannis, Orestis Efthimiou, Corentin J. Gosling et al.
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
article

Tool for Converting ADHD Rating Scales Scores Based on Individual Participant Data from 53 Randomized Controlled Trials of ADHD Medications

Anneka Tomlinson, Christos Christogiannis, Orestis Efthimiou, Corentin J. Gosling, Alessio Bellato, Dimitris Mavridis, Valeria Parlatini, Guilherme Fusetto Veronesi, Andrea Cipriani, Luis C. Farhat, Edoardo G. Ostinelli, Samuele Cortese, Sulagna Roy, Miguel Garcia-Argibay
article en

Abstract

Introduction: A variety of rating scales are currently being used to assess symptom severity and quantify symptoms change in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) research and clinical practice. This poses difficulties in interpreting scores from different scales in clinical practice and synthesizing data from studies using different scales. We aimed to develop algorithms for converting scores across the ADHD scales most often used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ADHD medications in children/adolescents and adults, and to develop an online tool for implementing the algorithms. Methods: We analyzed individual participant data from RCTs of ADHD medications (32 RCTs in children/adolescents, 21 in adults), with data on at least two scales per participant at the same timepoint. We applied a series of competing models, that is, univariable and multivariable regression, random forests, and an equipercentile linkage approach, to link pairs of scales. To assess the error of the linking procedure and identify the optimal model, we calculated the median absolute error and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> of all approaches by comparing the values predicted from the models to the observed ones. We subsequently developed a tool to implement the best algorithms. Results: We linked six commonly used ADHD scales, such as the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS-IV; investigator-rated) and the Conners’ Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-R:S). Spline models most frequently yielded the lowest prediction error, outperforming alternative conversion algorithms for absolute scores in 6 out of 12 univariable models and 8 out of 12 multivariable models. The tool for scores conversion is available at ADHD_Scale_Conversion_Tool . Conclusions: Our linkage algorithms enable the comparison and harmonization of findings across studies using different ADHD rating scales. Translating scores across scales improves the interpretability of research findings, facilitates future evidence synthesis across studies, and may support clinical practice. Our online tool supports the practical uptake of our results.

Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
University of Bern (CH), University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus (MY), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), King's College London (GB), University of Ioannina (GR), Örebro University (SE), Isle of Wight NHS Trust (GB), Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Warneford Hospital (GB), Karolinska Institutet (SE), National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Université Paris Nanterre (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Hôpital Robert-Debré (FR), Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (CH), University of Southampton (GB), University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.