Sustainability assurance – a review and research agenda

Purpose This paper systematically reviews the existing litearture on sustainability assurance, integrating insights from firms’ motivations, theoretical frameworks, assurance standards, and influencing factors of sustainability assurance quality. Design/methodology/approach This paper reviews and synthesises the literature on sustainability assurance within the accounting and finance domain. It systematically examines prior research to distill the core themes, theoretical foundations, methodological approaches, and key findings of sustainability assurance works. Findings Building on a systematic review of the sustainability assurance literature, this paper advances understanding of the field from multiple dimensions. Specifically, by synthesising and extending prior evidence on value creation, risk mitigation, legitimacy building, and the strengthening of internal control systems, it deepens insights into firms’ motivations for seeking sustainability assurance. Moreover, drawing on the perspectives of corporate social relations and the organisational environment, the study systematically integrates the main theoretical foundations of sustainability assurance and demonstrates how firms’ responses to institutional and stakeholder expectations shape the adoption, design, and implementation of assurance practices. At the same time, it critically identifies the limitations of current sustainability assurance standards—particularly regarding comparability, scope, and implementability—and reveals how these constraints affect assurance effectiveness and practical application. Finally, by incorporating the perspectives of assurance practitioners and sustainability report providers, the paper systematically identifies the key determinants of sustainability assurance quality. Meanwhile, this study highlights limitations in assurance quality measures and emphasises the need for more precise and multidimensional assessment approaches. Originality/value This paper highlights critical issues in sustainability assurance and proposes targeted improvements. Limited stakeholder engagement undermines assurance effectiveness, highlighting the need to better align managerial objectives with external stakeholder expectations. Moreover, ensuring credible sustainability assurance requires a clearer separation between financial audit and sustainability assurance functions, the strengthening of internal information systems, and the allocation of adequate organisational resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Accounting Literature
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jal-03-2026-0141
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainability assurance – a review and research agenda

Rui Xue, Yuxia Wang, Cao Wei, Jinna Zhang
Journal of Accounting Literature
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Sustainability assurance – a review and research agenda

Rui Xue, Yuxia Wang, Cao Wei, Jinna Zhang
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper systematically reviews the existing litearture on sustainability assurance, integrating insights from firms’ motivations, theoretical frameworks, assurance standards, and influencing factors of sustainability assurance quality. Design/methodology/approach This paper reviews and synthesises the literature on sustainability assurance within the accounting and finance domain. It systematically examines prior research to distill the core themes, theoretical foundations, methodological approaches, and key findings of sustainability assurance works. Findings Building on a systematic review of the sustainability assurance literature, this paper advances understanding of the field from multiple dimensions. Specifically, by synthesising and extending prior evidence on value creation, risk mitigation, legitimacy building, and the strengthening of internal control systems, it deepens insights into firms’ motivations for seeking sustainability assurance. Moreover, drawing on the perspectives of corporate social relations and the organisational environment, the study systematically integrates the main theoretical foundations of sustainability assurance and demonstrates how firms’ responses to institutional and stakeholder expectations shape the adoption, design, and implementation of assurance practices. At the same time, it critically identifies the limitations of current sustainability assurance standards—particularly regarding comparability, scope, and implementability—and reveals how these constraints affect assurance effectiveness and practical application. Finally, by incorporating the perspectives of assurance practitioners and sustainability report providers, the paper systematically identifies the key determinants of sustainability assurance quality. Meanwhile, this study highlights limitations in assurance quality measures and emphasises the need for more precise and multidimensional assessment approaches. Originality/value This paper highlights critical issues in sustainability assurance and proposes targeted improvements. Limited stakeholder engagement undermines assurance effectiveness, highlighting the need to better align managerial objectives with external stakeholder expectations. Moreover, ensuring credible sustainability assurance requires a clearer separation between financial audit and sustainability assurance functions, the strengthening of internal information systems, and the allocation of adequate organisational resources.

Journal of Accounting Literature
La Trobe University (AU), Shandong University of Finance and Economics (CN), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.