Domestic Demand or Trade Retaliation? China's Policy Responses to U.S. Tariff Hikes

ABSTRACT Rising deglobalization has increased external uncertainty for the global economy. This paper develops a China–US Trade Equilibrium (CUTE) model that integrates monetary mechanisms and Hicksian welfare decomposition to examine the effects of U.S. tariff hikes on China and the U.S., as well as China's policy responses. A key contribution is the comparison of policy responses under identical policy costs. The results show that the direct macroeconomic impact of U.S. tariffs on China is modest, reflecting limited trade exposure and strong substitution effects, while broad tariffs generate larger welfare losses for the America through price increases and real income erosion. The reaction directly supporting household income and consumption yield substantially higher welfare returns than trade retaliation, government spending or monetary easing, as tariffs reduce real purchasing power. We suggest within the institutional settings considered, prioritizing household‐based demand support is a more effective response to external tariff shocks than retaliatory trade measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Economy
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.70106
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Domestic Demand or Trade Retaliation? China's Policy Responses to U.S. Tariff Hikes

Rongxin Wu, Zhijie Jia, Shiyan Wen
World Economy
Global trade and economics
article

Domestic Demand or Trade Retaliation? China's Policy Responses to U.S. Tariff Hikes

Rongxin Wu, Zhijie Jia, Shiyan Wen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Rising deglobalization has increased external uncertainty for the global economy. This paper develops a China–US Trade Equilibrium (CUTE) model that integrates monetary mechanisms and Hicksian welfare decomposition to examine the effects of U.S. tariff hikes on China and the U.S., as well as China's policy responses. A key contribution is the comparison of policy responses under identical policy costs. The results show that the direct macroeconomic impact of U.S. tariffs on China is modest, reflecting limited trade exposure and strong substitution effects, while broad tariffs generate larger welfare losses for the America through price increases and real income erosion. The reaction directly supporting household income and consumption yield substantially higher welfare returns than trade retaliation, government spending or monetary easing, as tariffs reduce real purchasing power. We suggest within the institutional settings considered, prioritizing household‐based demand support is a more effective response to external tariff shocks than retaliatory trade measures.

World Economy
National University of Singapore (SG), Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN), Xi'an University of Finance and Economics (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.