Psychological Contracts With Purpose: A Review and Path Forward

ABSTRACT This review advances the understanding of psychological contracts (PCs) that include third‐party beneficiaries and transcend self‐interested goals, which we term “PCs with purpose.” PC theory has challenged the assumption that social exchange relies solely on balanced rewards and inducements, highlighting that individuals may wish to contribute beyond the traditional give‐and‐take. Consequently, scholarly attention to ideological currency has grown, coinciding with the increasing prominence of purpose in management research and practice. Existing research on PCs in volunteering, the public sector, and nonprofit organizations offers additional insights into contexts where purpose is integral to organizational mission. Yet despite its relevance for employees and organizations, there is little consensus on how purpose should be systematically incorporated into PC literature. This review clarifies the role of purpose in the employee‐employer exchange as captured across the disparate strands of PC research. We develop a comprehensive framework of existing research, identify key challenges, and offer directions for addressing them. In doing so, the review provides new theoretical directions and a rich research agenda for advancing the understanding of PCs with purpose. We argue that foregrounding purpose in PCs will future‐proof the framework's relevance for understanding the employment relationship among employees who strive to make a difference through their work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.70108
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological Contracts With Purpose: A Review and Path Forward

Marjo‐Riitta Diehl, Anna Kevätsalo, jacqueline coyle-shapiro
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

Psychological Contracts With Purpose: A Review and Path Forward

Marjo‐Riitta Diehl, Anna Kevätsalo, jacqueline coyle-shapiro
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This review advances the understanding of psychological contracts (PCs) that include third‐party beneficiaries and transcend self‐interested goals, which we term “PCs with purpose.” PC theory has challenged the assumption that social exchange relies solely on balanced rewards and inducements, highlighting that individuals may wish to contribute beyond the traditional give‐and‐take. Consequently, scholarly attention to ideological currency has grown, coinciding with the increasing prominence of purpose in management research and practice. Existing research on PCs in volunteering, the public sector, and nonprofit organizations offers additional insights into contexts where purpose is integral to organizational mission. Yet despite its relevance for employees and organizations, there is little consensus on how purpose should be systematically incorporated into PC literature. This review clarifies the role of purpose in the employee‐employer exchange as captured across the disparate strands of PC research. We develop a comprehensive framework of existing research, identify key challenges, and offer directions for addressing them. In doing so, the review provides new theoretical directions and a rich research agenda for advancing the understanding of PCs with purpose. We argue that foregrounding purpose in PCs will future‐proof the framework's relevance for understanding the employment relationship among employees who strive to make a difference through their work.

Journal of Organizational Behavior
California State University, San Bernardino (US), Aalto University (FI)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.