Pediatric Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR): Understanding Variations in Systems and Clinical Practice

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for pediatric cardiac arrest relies on enhanced resources and time-critical decision-making. We aimed to evaluate variations in systems and clinical practice among extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) centers that offer ECPR for neonatal and pediatric patients using an online survey. Fifty-three ECMO centers participated, representing all five ELSO chapters. All centers had a similar understanding of the ECPR definition. The predominant intensive care unit (ICU) patient population was: cardiac (34%), mixed (51%), general (7.5%), neonatal (1%), and mixed adult and pediatric (6.5%). All centers activated ECPR teams within 10 minutes of starting conventional CPR. Thirty-four (64%) centers keep a primed circuit available for ECPR 24/7. Thirty-six (68%) centers have an institutional protocol on ECPR. The cardiac surgeon was the most common (94%) cannulator. Staffing levels varied during working hours compared to nights and weekends. Thirty-eight (71%) centers did not apply cooling measures during and after the initiation of ECPR. Oxygenation and CO2 strategy varied between centers upon ECMO flow commencement. Forty-two (81%) centers aimed to maintain normothermia and avoid hyperthermia. Twenty-three (44%) centers have guidelines on organ donation and neurodevelopmental follow-up. Conclusion-significant variations exist in systems and clinical practice among ECMO centers offering pediatric ECPR. Further research is needed to understand the reasons for these differences and their impacts on patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASAIO Journal
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/mat.0000000000002740
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pediatric Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR): Understanding Variations in Systems and Clinical Practice

Cvetković, Timothy Thiruchelvam, Ajay Desai, A. Hoskote et al.
ASAIO Journal
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Pediatric Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR): Understanding Variations in Systems and Clinical Practice

Cvetković, Timothy Thiruchelvam, Ajay Desai, A. Hoskote, Maura O’Callaghan, Peter P. Roeleveld, Lakshmi Raman, Anne Marie Guerguerian, Jan Belohlavek, Uri Pollak, Mark Davidson
article en

Abstract

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for pediatric cardiac arrest relies on enhanced resources and time-critical decision-making. We aimed to evaluate variations in systems and clinical practice among extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) centers that offer ECPR for neonatal and pediatric patients using an online survey. Fifty-three ECMO centers participated, representing all five ELSO chapters. All centers had a similar understanding of the ECPR definition. The predominant intensive care unit (ICU) patient population was: cardiac (34%), mixed (51%), general (7.5%), neonatal (1%), and mixed adult and pediatric (6.5%). All centers activated ECPR teams within 10 minutes of starting conventional CPR. Thirty-four (64%) centers keep a primed circuit available for ECPR 24/7. Thirty-six (68%) centers have an institutional protocol on ECPR. The cardiac surgeon was the most common (94%) cannulator. Staffing levels varied during working hours compared to nights and weekends. Thirty-eight (71%) centers did not apply cooling measures during and after the initiation of ECPR. Oxygenation and CO2 strategy varied between centers upon ECMO flow commencement. Forty-two (81%) centers aimed to maintain normothermia and avoid hyperthermia. Twenty-three (44%) centers have guidelines on organ donation and neurodevelopmental follow-up. Conclusion-significant variations exist in systems and clinical practice among ECMO centers offering pediatric ECPR. Further research is needed to understand the reasons for these differences and their impacts on patient outcomes.

ASAIO Journal
Hadassah Medical Center (IL), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB), Royal Hospital for Children (GB), Hospital for Sick Children (CA), Royal Brompton Hospital (GB), General University Hospital in Prague (CZ), University College London (GB), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.