Dollar Hegemony and the Impossible Dilemma of BRICS Currency Alternatives: Identifying the Binding Constraint

ABSTRACT The proposal for a BRICS common currency lacks rigorous analytical treatment of which specific constraint makes it structurally inviable. This article applies a binding constraint methodology, adapted from Hausmann et al. (2008), to evaluate the institutional, financial, and geopolitical constraints confronting the BRICS common currency proposal under current international monetary architecture. Through structured focused comparison and counterfactual analysis, the article demonstrates that the financial convertibility and capital account constraint is binding: all five core BRICS members share an identical normalized Chinn‐Ito capital account openness score of 0.16, against a Eurozone founding‐member comparator of 0.82–1.00, placing the grouping uniformly in the bottom quartile of global capital account openness. Resolving institutional or geopolitical constraints alone cannot unlock monetary union viability; resolving the capital account constraint is necessary, though not sufficient, for viability to become conceivable. The article reframes the policy debate on BRICS de‐dollarization and contributes a structural corrective to the Eurozone analogy dominant in existing literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Economics and Sociology
Published
2026-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.70061
Primary Topic
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dollar Hegemony and the Impossible Dilemma of BRICS Currency Alternatives: Identifying the Binding Constraint

S. Liv
American Journal of Economics and Sociology
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
article

Dollar Hegemony and the Impossible Dilemma of BRICS Currency Alternatives: Identifying the Binding Constraint

S. Liv
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The proposal for a BRICS common currency lacks rigorous analytical treatment of which specific constraint makes it structurally inviable. This article applies a binding constraint methodology, adapted from Hausmann et al. (2008), to evaluate the institutional, financial, and geopolitical constraints confronting the BRICS common currency proposal under current international monetary architecture. Through structured focused comparison and counterfactual analysis, the article demonstrates that the financial convertibility and capital account constraint is binding: all five core BRICS members share an identical normalized Chinn‐Ito capital account openness score of 0.16, against a Eurozone founding‐member comparator of 0.82–1.00, placing the grouping uniformly in the bottom quartile of global capital account openness. Resolving institutional or geopolitical constraints alone cannot unlock monetary union viability; resolving the capital account constraint is necessary, though not sufficient, for viability to become conceivable. The article reframes the policy debate on BRICS de‐dollarization and contributes a structural corrective to the Eurozone analogy dominant in existing literature.

American Journal of Economics and Sociology
Central University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.