On the consistency of Schopenhauer’s compassionate racism

The eminent Schopenhauerian scholar Christopher Janaway has observed a particular inconsistency in Schopenhauer’s thinking, namely that although Schopenhauer was vociferously opposed to the slavery of our “innocent black brothers”, he also regarded black people as intellectually inferior and “closer to animals”. The purpose of the present article is twofold. First, it explicates and discusses Schopenhauer’s racial classificatory system, which is hardly, if ever, discussed in the secondary literature on Schopenhauer’s philosophy, highlighting its racist elements by way of a discussion on the pseudo-scientific concept of phrenology, to which Schopenhauer subscribed. Second, the article argues in response to Janaway’s justified criticism that Schopenhauer’s inconsistency is merely apparent. The distinction between the world as it appears and as it is in-itself allows Schopenhauer to oppose the slavery of black people on the one hand, while simultaneously maintaining a racist attitude towards them, on the other.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
South African Journal of Philosophy
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2026.2680814
Primary Topic
Schopenhauer and Stefan Zweig
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the consistency of Schopenhauer’s compassionate racism

Jonti Bloomberg
South African Journal of Philosophy
Schopenhauer and Stefan Zweig
article

On the consistency of Schopenhauer’s compassionate racism

Jonti Bloomberg
article en

Abstract

The eminent Schopenhauerian scholar Christopher Janaway has observed a particular inconsistency in Schopenhauer’s thinking, namely that although Schopenhauer was vociferously opposed to the slavery of our “innocent black brothers”, he also regarded black people as intellectually inferior and “closer to animals”. The purpose of the present article is twofold. First, it explicates and discusses Schopenhauer’s racial classificatory system, which is hardly, if ever, discussed in the secondary literature on Schopenhauer’s philosophy, highlighting its racist elements by way of a discussion on the pseudo-scientific concept of phrenology, to which Schopenhauer subscribed. Second, the article argues in response to Janaway’s justified criticism that Schopenhauer’s inconsistency is merely apparent. The distinction between the world as it appears and as it is in-itself allows Schopenhauer to oppose the slavery of black people on the one hand, while simultaneously maintaining a racist attitude towards them, on the other.

South African Journal of Philosophy
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Schopenhauer and Stefan Zweig
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.