Artificial intelligence in procurement: a systematic and AI-assisted literature review

Purpose This study investigates the application of artificial intelligence (AI) within global procurement processes. It builds upon prior literature and offers novel methodological insights while pinpointing trends and outlining research gaps for future investigations. Design/methodology/approach The study combines a bibliometric literature review using VOSviewer with an AI-assisted review process. AI tools, including ChatGPT, are integrated into selected stages of the review and examined alongside researcher-driven approaches to assess their usefulness and limitations in supporting systematic literature analysis. Findings The results indicate a shift in AI use in procurement from isolated automation toward more strategic integration. The literature increasingly focuses on strategic areas such as supplier management, while comprehensive implementation frameworks remain limited. The analysis of AI-assisted reviewing suggests that such tools can support efficiency and consistency, but their application remains sensitive to conceptual ambiguity and requires human oversight, particularly in classification tasks. Originality/value This study offers two distinct contributions to the literature. First, it provides a focused analysis of how research on AI in procurement has evolved since previous systematic literature reviews (SLRs), emphasising studies that examine real-world implementation and effectiveness rather than merely discussing willingness or barriers to adoption. Second, it provides an exploratory assessment of AI-assisted reviewing as an emerging methodological approach, highlighting both its potential and its current limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Process Management Journal
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-10-2025-1701
Primary Topic
Public Procurement and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence in procurement: a systematic and AI-assisted literature review

Kerstin Bremser, Aleksandra Kania, Dominik Berbig, Katarzyna Mroczek‐Dąbrowska
Business Process Management Journal
Public Procurement and Policy
article

Artificial intelligence in procurement: a systematic and AI-assisted literature review

Kerstin Bremser, Aleksandra Kania, Dominik Berbig, Katarzyna Mroczek‐Dąbrowska
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates the application of artificial intelligence (AI) within global procurement processes. It builds upon prior literature and offers novel methodological insights while pinpointing trends and outlining research gaps for future investigations. Design/methodology/approach The study combines a bibliometric literature review using VOSviewer with an AI-assisted review process. AI tools, including ChatGPT, are integrated into selected stages of the review and examined alongside researcher-driven approaches to assess their usefulness and limitations in supporting systematic literature analysis. Findings The results indicate a shift in AI use in procurement from isolated automation toward more strategic integration. The literature increasingly focuses on strategic areas such as supplier management, while comprehensive implementation frameworks remain limited. The analysis of AI-assisted reviewing suggests that such tools can support efficiency and consistency, but their application remains sensitive to conceptual ambiguity and requires human oversight, particularly in classification tasks. Originality/value This study offers two distinct contributions to the literature. First, it provides a focused analysis of how research on AI in procurement has evolved since previous systematic literature reviews (SLRs), emphasising studies that examine real-world implementation and effectiveness rather than merely discussing willingness or barriers to adoption. Second, it provides an exploratory assessment of AI-assisted reviewing as an emerging methodological approach, highlighting both its potential and its current limitations.

Business Process Management Journal
Poznań University of Economics and Business (PL), Pforzheim University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Public Procurement and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.