When Do Sanctions On Terrorist Groups Work?

A substantial amount of literature studies the effects of sanctions against states, but far less is known about sanctions against violent non-state actors. We argue and show that the effectiveness of counterterrorism sanctions hinges on terrorist groups’ financial adaptability. Groups with low financial adaptability are likely to reduce attacks due to sanctions. In contrast, groups with high financial adaptability are likely to adapt to sanctions and continue attacks. A case study analysis of the 80 US Foreign Terrorist Organizations between 1997 and 2019, summarized in a systematic large-n qualitative study, supports this claim. We find no evidence that foreign terrorist organization (FTO) sanctions reduce attacks when terrorist groups possess high financial adaptability. FTO sanctions led to only reduced attacks for a few low- and medium-adaptability groups. Our analysis is the first to show a direct link between adaptability and counterterrorism sanctions, with important implications for adaptation and the role of sanctions as a foreign policy instrument.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Security Studies
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2026.2619491
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Do Sanctions On Terrorist Groups Work?

Hyeran Jo, Brian J. Phillips, Joshua Alley
Security Studies
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
article

When Do Sanctions On Terrorist Groups Work?

Hyeran Jo, Brian J. Phillips, Joshua Alley
article en

Abstract

A substantial amount of literature studies the effects of sanctions against states, but far less is known about sanctions against violent non-state actors. We argue and show that the effectiveness of counterterrorism sanctions hinges on terrorist groups’ financial adaptability. Groups with low financial adaptability are likely to reduce attacks due to sanctions. In contrast, groups with high financial adaptability are likely to adapt to sanctions and continue attacks. A case study analysis of the 80 US Foreign Terrorist Organizations between 1997 and 2019, summarized in a systematic large-n qualitative study, supports this claim. We find no evidence that foreign terrorist organization (FTO) sanctions reduce attacks when terrorist groups possess high financial adaptability. FTO sanctions led to only reduced attacks for a few low- and medium-adaptability groups. Our analysis is the first to show a direct link between adaptability and counterterrorism sanctions, with important implications for adaptation and the role of sanctions as a foreign policy instrument.

Security Studies
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.