Shape-aware dissimilarity measures for process TCAD model calibration

Abstract Traditional calibration of semiconductor TCAD models for topography modifying processes often relies on matching critical dimensions (CDs). This approach is prone to subjective measurement and fails to capture overall profile shape differences, thereby limiting the accuracy and effectiveness of model optimization. In this work, we address this limitation by adapting computer vision techniques for TCAD model calibration. We comprehensively evaluate several shape dissimilarity measures (SDM): the established Chamfer Distance (CHD) and two novel level-set-based measures, the Area Difference (AD) and the Sparse Field Distance (SFD). Through a rigorous computational case study, testing for sensitivity, robustness, and efficiency, we demonstrate that SFD and CHD significantly outperform traditional CD matching and area-based methods for semiconductor profile comparison derived from a representative scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image. These standardized SDMs are crucial for leveraging emerging large-scale electron microscopy datasets and enabling robust, machine learning-driven model development.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computational Electronics
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10825-026-02582-9
Primary Topic
Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shape-aware dissimilarity measures for process TCAD model calibration

Manuel Kleinbichler, S. Di Nicola, Lado Filipovic, Tobias Reiter et al.
Journal of Computational Electronics
Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
article

Shape-aware dissimilarity measures for process TCAD model calibration

Manuel Kleinbichler, S. Di Nicola, Lado Filipovic, Tobias Reiter, Roman Kostal, Paul Manstetten
article en

Abstract

Abstract Traditional calibration of semiconductor TCAD models for topography modifying processes often relies on matching critical dimensions (CDs). This approach is prone to subjective measurement and fails to capture overall profile shape differences, thereby limiting the accuracy and effectiveness of model optimization. In this work, we address this limitation by adapting computer vision techniques for TCAD model calibration. We comprehensively evaluate several shape dissimilarity measures (SDM): the established Chamfer Distance (CHD) and two novel level-set-based measures, the Area Difference (AD) and the Sparse Field Distance (SFD). Through a rigorous computational case study, testing for sensitivity, robustness, and efficiency, we demonstrate that SFD and CHD significantly outperform traditional CD matching and area-based methods for semiconductor profile comparison derived from a representative scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image. These standardized SDMs are crucial for leveraging emerging large-scale electron microscopy datasets and enabling robust, machine learning-driven model development.

Journal of Computational ElectronicsVol. 25(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.