Deep learning–based CT slice synthesis improves radiomic feature reproducibility and discriminative performance in lung nodule assessment

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of CT slice thickness on radiomic features (RFs) in terms of reproducibility and discriminative power, and to assess whether a deep learning-based CT slice synthesis (DLS) algorithm can mitigate the adverse effects associated with thick-slice CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included 506 patients with lung nodules (245 benign, 261 malignant) from two independent cohorts, which were divided into a training set, internal validation set (IVS), and external validation set (EVS). Chest CT reconstructed at 1-mm and 5-mm slice thicknesses was analyzed. A DLS algorithm was applied to convert 5-mm CT into synthetic 1-mm CT. RFs were extracted from all CT types to construct radiomics models. Reproducibility was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and compared with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Discriminative power was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared with DeLong's test. RESULTS: The CCCs of DLS 1-mm CT were 0.48 ± 0.37 and 0.49 ± 0.37 in Cohort 1 and Cohort 2, respectively, significantly higher than real 5-mm CT (all p < 0.001). Most RFs from 5-mm CT lacked reproducibility (CCC ≥ 0.85; 0.9% in both Cohort 1 and Cohort 2), whereas DLS 1-mm CT showed marked improvement (Cohort 1, 27.6%; Cohort 2, 26.9%). The discriminative power of RFs from DLS 1-mm CT was superior to that of 5-mm CT and non-inferior to real 1-mm CT, both in model construction and evaluation. CONCLUSION: CT slice thickness substantially influences the reproducibility and discriminative power of RFs, whereas the DLS algorithm effectively mitigates the limitations associated with thick-slice CT. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Deep learning-based CT slice synthesis significantly reduces the slice thickness-related variability in radiomics feature reproducibility and discriminative power, providing a promising methodological approach to improve radiomics standardization and support its clinical translation. KEY POINTS: CT slice thickness variability substantially impairs radiomic feature reproducibility and discriminative performance, posing a major barrier to standardized radiomics analysis. Across two independent cohorts, deep learning-based slice synthesis mitigated the adverse effects of thick-slice CT on radiomic feature reproducibility and cross-thickness discriminative performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights into Imaging
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-026-02338-w
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep learning–based CT slice synthesis improves radiomic feature reproducibility and discriminative performance in lung nodule assessment

Zhengping Zhang, Pei Dang, Juan Chen, Jingjie Li et al.
Insights into Imaging
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Deep learning–based CT slice synthesis improves radiomic feature reproducibility and discriminative performance in lung nodule assessment

Zhengping Zhang, Pei Dang, Juan Chen, Jingjie Li, Zhiyuan Zhou, Lei Tian, Lei Cao, Xiaoyan Yang, Long Wan, Hujun Yang
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of CT slice thickness on radiomic features (RFs) in terms of reproducibility and discriminative power, and to assess whether a deep learning-based CT slice synthesis (DLS) algorithm can mitigate the adverse effects associated with thick-slice CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included 506 patients with lung nodules (245 benign, 261 malignant) from two independent cohorts, which were divided into a training set, internal validation set (IVS), and external validation set (EVS). Chest CT reconstructed at 1-mm and 5-mm slice thicknesses was analyzed. A DLS algorithm was applied to convert 5-mm CT into synthetic 1-mm CT. RFs were extracted from all CT types to construct radiomics models. Reproducibility was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and compared with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Discriminative power was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared with DeLong's test. RESULTS: The CCCs of DLS 1-mm CT were 0.48 ± 0.37 and 0.49 ± 0.37 in Cohort 1 and Cohort 2, respectively, significantly higher than real 5-mm CT (all p < 0.001). Most RFs from 5-mm CT lacked reproducibility (CCC ≥ 0.85; 0.9% in both Cohort 1 and Cohort 2), whereas DLS 1-mm CT showed marked improvement (Cohort 1, 27.6%; Cohort 2, 26.9%). The discriminative power of RFs from DLS 1-mm CT was superior to that of 5-mm CT and non-inferior to real 1-mm CT, both in model construction and evaluation. CONCLUSION: CT slice thickness substantially influences the reproducibility and discriminative power of RFs, whereas the DLS algorithm effectively mitigates the limitations associated with thick-slice CT. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Deep learning-based CT slice synthesis significantly reduces the slice thickness-related variability in radiomics feature reproducibility and discriminative power, providing a promising methodological approach to improve radiomics standardization and support its clinical translation. KEY POINTS: CT slice thickness variability substantially impairs radiomic feature reproducibility and discriminative performance, posing a major barrier to standardized radiomics analysis. Across two independent cohorts, deep learning-based slice synthesis mitigated the adverse effects of thick-slice CT on radiomic feature reproducibility and cross-thickness discriminative performance.

Insights into ImagingVol. 17(1)
Ningxia Medical University (CN), Ningxia Medical University General Hospital (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.