The transportation penalty of source separation: A case study of food waste in Oslo

Optical sorting systems offer convenient municipal waste management but face persistent challenges with material purity and cross-contamination. In Oslo, these long-standing issues have been exacerbated by recent policy incentives that unintentionally discouraged proper sorting, and stricter regulatory targets are now prompting a re-evaluation of source separation. Using Oslo’s complete road network and operational data, we model three curbside food-waste collection strategies through arc-routing optimization: the current commingled baseline, separate collection with dedicated single-compartment fleets (residual stream collected weekly or bi-weekly), and co-collection with multi-compartment vehicles The logistical impact depends strongly on the chosen strategy. Decoupling streams into separate fleets introduces significant route redundancy: weekly separate collection adds about 17% driving distance at current sorting levels, and switching the residual stream to bi-weekly roughly halves this penalty without closing it. Co-collection minimizes this penalty by preserving route density, with transport requirements approaching the commingled baseline as the compartment split better matches the waste-generation ratio, falling within 3% under close matching. However, transport minimization comes at the cost of operational adaptability. Multi-compartment vehicles impose rigidities on collection frequencies and offloading infrastructure, and their efficiency is fragile: it requires precise alignment between compartment configuration and waste generation, a target that shifts as sorting compliance evolves. The dedicated-fleet penalty is structural: each fleet traverses the network independently, and reducing the residual collection frequency narrows but does not close the gap. Collection strategy, infrastructure placement, and the policy levers shaping compliance together determine the transportation outcome and should be planned jointly rather than separately.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Waste Management Bulletin
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wmb.2026.100328
Primary Topic
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The transportation penalty of source separation: A case study of food waste in Oslo

Karim Tamssaouet, Eirill Bø, Samuel Berntzen Karoubi, Preeyatorn Khajai
Waste Management Bulletin
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
article

The transportation penalty of source separation: A case study of food waste in Oslo

Karim Tamssaouet, Eirill Bø, Samuel Berntzen Karoubi, Preeyatorn Khajai
article en

Abstract

Optical sorting systems offer convenient municipal waste management but face persistent challenges with material purity and cross-contamination. In Oslo, these long-standing issues have been exacerbated by recent policy incentives that unintentionally discouraged proper sorting, and stricter regulatory targets are now prompting a re-evaluation of source separation. Using Oslo’s complete road network and operational data, we model three curbside food-waste collection strategies through arc-routing optimization: the current commingled baseline, separate collection with dedicated single-compartment fleets (residual stream collected weekly or bi-weekly), and co-collection with multi-compartment vehicles The logistical impact depends strongly on the chosen strategy. Decoupling streams into separate fleets introduces significant route redundancy: weekly separate collection adds about 17% driving distance at current sorting levels, and switching the residual stream to bi-weekly roughly halves this penalty without closing it. Co-collection minimizes this penalty by preserving route density, with transport requirements approaching the commingled baseline as the compartment split better matches the waste-generation ratio, falling within 3% under close matching. However, transport minimization comes at the cost of operational adaptability. Multi-compartment vehicles impose rigidities on collection frequencies and offloading infrastructure, and their efficiency is fragile: it requires precise alignment between compartment configuration and waste generation, a target that shifts as sorting compliance evolves. The dedicated-fleet penalty is structural: each fleet traverses the network independently, and reducing the residual collection frequency narrows but does not close the gap. Collection strategy, infrastructure placement, and the policy levers shaping compliance together determine the transportation outcome and should be planned jointly rather than separately.

Waste Management BulletinVol. 4(3)
BI Norwegian Business School (NO), Norwegian Environment Agency (NO)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.