Effect of a Mobile App on Medication Errors During Simulated Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: PEDIDOSIS App vs. Conventional Methods. A Multicenter Simulation-based Randomized Controlled Trial

Despite its low incidence, pediatric cardiopulmonary arrest remains associated with high mortality and morbidity. The adequate preparation and administration of drugs can impact favourably on the outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Nursing staff rely on cognitive aids such as paper support, calculators, or spreadsheets to ensure correct drug administration. Numerous strategies have been proposed to prevent medication errors, including the emergence of mHealth. This study evaluates the efficacy and usefulness of the PEDIDOSIS smartphone application (app) for nursing staff in a simulated pediatric emergency setting. A multicentre high-fidelity simulation-based randomized controlled trial was conducted in a pediatric emergency setting with nursing professionals from different hospitals in Spain. Randomisation groups: PEDIDOSIS app (La Paz Hospital, Spain) vs. conventional methods (such as printed or electronic medication tables, smartphones, calculators or no cognitive aid). To avoid bias due to differences in pediatric emergency experience, each group was randomly assigned the same number of participants with experience (> 5 years) and without experience (≤ 5 years). Epinephrine, bicarbonate, midazolam, and norepinephrine on two ocassions were administered in a simulation scenario. Number and magnitude of medication errors, time taken to drug administration were evaluated as measured with video recording; stress, satisfaction, and usability as measured using standardized survey tools were evaluated. One-hundred and five nurses participated. The incidence of wrong dose administration by any deviation from the correct dose was 51.5% for the control group vs. 26.4% for the PEDIDOSIS app group (p < 0.001). The OR for a wrong dose administration > 10% deviation with PEDIDOSIS app vs. conventional methods was 0.24 [0.14-0.4]), with a risk difference of 20.7%. The proportion of participants committing several medication errors (ME) was substantially lower with the app (15.1%) than with conventional methods (57.7%). Overall satisfaction regarding drug preparation was higher and stress lower in the app group. The System Usability Scale (SUS) score obtained for PEDIDOSIS app was 78.9 out of 100.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Systems
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-026-02425-x
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of a Mobile App on Medication Errors During Simulated Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: PEDIDOSIS App vs. Conventional Methods. A Multicenter Simulation-based Randomized Controlled Trial

Carlos Durantez‐Fernández, Héctor Ruiz-Rojo, Teresa de Rojas, Ana Martínez-Serrano et al.
Journal of Medical Systems
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
article

Effect of a Mobile App on Medication Errors During Simulated Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: PEDIDOSIS App vs. Conventional Methods. A Multicenter Simulation-based Randomized Controlled Trial

Carlos Durantez‐Fernández, Héctor Ruiz-Rojo, Teresa de Rojas, Ana Martínez-Serrano, M. Ruano Encinar, Paula García-Sánchez
article en

Abstract

Despite its low incidence, pediatric cardiopulmonary arrest remains associated with high mortality and morbidity. The adequate preparation and administration of drugs can impact favourably on the outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Nursing staff rely on cognitive aids such as paper support, calculators, or spreadsheets to ensure correct drug administration. Numerous strategies have been proposed to prevent medication errors, including the emergence of mHealth. This study evaluates the efficacy and usefulness of the PEDIDOSIS smartphone application (app) for nursing staff in a simulated pediatric emergency setting. A multicentre high-fidelity simulation-based randomized controlled trial was conducted in a pediatric emergency setting with nursing professionals from different hospitals in Spain. Randomisation groups: PEDIDOSIS app (La Paz Hospital, Spain) vs. conventional methods (such as printed or electronic medication tables, smartphones, calculators or no cognitive aid). To avoid bias due to differences in pediatric emergency experience, each group was randomly assigned the same number of participants with experience (> 5 years) and without experience (≤ 5 years). Epinephrine, bicarbonate, midazolam, and norepinephrine on two ocassions were administered in a simulation scenario. Number and magnitude of medication errors, time taken to drug administration were evaluated as measured with video recording; stress, satisfaction, and usability as measured using standardized survey tools were evaluated. One-hundred and five nurses participated. The incidence of wrong dose administration by any deviation from the correct dose was 51.5% for the control group vs. 26.4% for the PEDIDOSIS app group (p < 0.001). The OR for a wrong dose administration > 10% deviation with PEDIDOSIS app vs. conventional methods was 0.24 [0.14-0.4]), with a risk difference of 20.7%. The proportion of participants committing several medication errors (ME) was substantially lower with the app (15.1%) than with conventional methods (57.7%). Overall satisfaction regarding drug preparation was higher and stress lower in the app group. The System Usability Scale (SUS) score obtained for PEDIDOSIS app was 78.9 out of 100.

Journal of Medical SystemsVol. 50(1)
Universidad de Valladolid (ES), Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES), Schweizerische Ärztegesellschaft für Psycholytische Therapie (CH), Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia (ES)
Universidad de Valladolid, Junta de Castilla y León
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.