Police legitimacy and digital technologies: Integrating procedural justice theorizing, dialogic legitimacy, and police facial recognition technology adoption

Police legitimacy is conceived as constantly being reconstituted through people’s interactions with police. Previous research on procedural justice and legitimacy has mostly focused on in-person police-community interaction. However, the increasing use of digital technologies by police has meant that more policing is done online and without face-to-face interaction with the public. Using facial recognition technology as an exemplar, this paper argues that adopting technologies using the pillars of procedural justice improves police legitimacy. Moreover, we make the case that the adoption of technologies is an act of dialogic legitimacy where police seek responses/consent from communities to guide further technology adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258x261462344
Primary Topic
Policing Practices and Perceptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Police legitimacy and digital technologies: Integrating procedural justice theorizing, dialogic legitimacy, and police facial recognition technology adoption

Christopher D. O’Connor, Madison Charman
The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles
Policing Practices and Perceptions
article

Police legitimacy and digital technologies: Integrating procedural justice theorizing, dialogic legitimacy, and police facial recognition technology adoption

Christopher D. O’Connor, Madison Charman
article en

Abstract

Police legitimacy is conceived as constantly being reconstituted through people’s interactions with police. Previous research on procedural justice and legitimacy has mostly focused on in-person police-community interaction. However, the increasing use of digital technologies by police has meant that more policing is done online and without face-to-face interaction with the public. Using facial recognition technology as an exemplar, this paper argues that adopting technologies using the pillars of procedural justice improves police legitimacy. Moreover, we make the case that the adoption of technologies is an act of dialogic legitimacy where police seek responses/consent from communities to guide further technology adoption.

The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles
Ontario Tech University (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Policing Practices and Perceptions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.