A systematic review and meta-analysis on labour pain management methods utilization and its associated factors among obstetric caregivers in Ethiopia

Despite growing attention to maternal health, labour pain management remains a neglected aspect of obstetric care in Ethiopia. Existing studies in Ethiopia on labour pain management among obstetric caregivers (OCGs) provide some insights; their findings are often inconsistent, geographically limited, and lack national representativeness. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the utilization of labour pain management methods and associated factors among obstetric caregivers in Ethiopia. This review included all observational, full-text, English-language, published, and gray studies that reported on labour pain management practices or associated factors among obstetric caregivers in Ethiopia, searched from July 1-September 12/2025. Studies were identified via a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, PUBMED, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Google Scholar, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and a direct Google search of international databases. Methodological quality and heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed using the Hoy D et al. risk of bias tool & I² statistic, respectively. Publication bias was checked using Egger’s and funnel plots. All statistical analyses were conducted using STATA version 17.0. Half of the included studies were rated as high quality. About 45.18% of OCGs utilized labour pain management methods (95% CI: 39.87–50.48). Utilization was higher among female OCGs (Adjusted Odd Ratio [AOR] = 1.90; 95% CI: 1.24–2.93), midwives (AOR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.15–1.94), having adequate knowledge of labour pain (AOR = 2.61; 95% CI: 1.51–4.53), having received training on labour pain management (AOR = 3.05; 95% CI: 2.17–4.30), working in facilities with adequate supplies (AOR = 5.43; 95% CI: 2.90-10.14), the presence of labour pain management protocol (AOR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.46–2.90), and perceiving of labour pain as moderate to severe (AOR = 2.21; 95% CI: 1.40–3.49). Fewer than one in two OCGs utilized labour pain management methods. Individual caregiver characteristics (sex, profession, knowledge) and institutional factors (protocols, supplies, training) were associated with labour pain relief utilization among obstetric caregivers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-026-09496-1
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review and meta-analysis on labour pain management methods utilization and its associated factors among obstetric caregivers in Ethiopia

Bewket Yeserah Aynalem, Keralem Anteneh Bishaw, Demewoze Kefale
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

A systematic review and meta-analysis on labour pain management methods utilization and its associated factors among obstetric caregivers in Ethiopia

Bewket Yeserah Aynalem, Keralem Anteneh Bishaw, Demewoze Kefale
article en

Abstract

Despite growing attention to maternal health, labour pain management remains a neglected aspect of obstetric care in Ethiopia. Existing studies in Ethiopia on labour pain management among obstetric caregivers (OCGs) provide some insights; their findings are often inconsistent, geographically limited, and lack national representativeness. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the utilization of labour pain management methods and associated factors among obstetric caregivers in Ethiopia. This review included all observational, full-text, English-language, published, and gray studies that reported on labour pain management practices or associated factors among obstetric caregivers in Ethiopia, searched from July 1-September 12/2025. Studies were identified via a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, PUBMED, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Google Scholar, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and a direct Google search of international databases. Methodological quality and heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed using the Hoy D et al. risk of bias tool & I² statistic, respectively. Publication bias was checked using Egger’s and funnel plots. All statistical analyses were conducted using STATA version 17.0. Half of the included studies were rated as high quality. About 45.18% of OCGs utilized labour pain management methods (95% CI: 39.87–50.48). Utilization was higher among female OCGs (Adjusted Odd Ratio [AOR] = 1.90; 95% CI: 1.24–2.93), midwives (AOR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.15–1.94), having adequate knowledge of labour pain (AOR = 2.61; 95% CI: 1.51–4.53), having received training on labour pain management (AOR = 3.05; 95% CI: 2.17–4.30), working in facilities with adequate supplies (AOR = 5.43; 95% CI: 2.90-10.14), the presence of labour pain management protocol (AOR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.46–2.90), and perceiving of labour pain as moderate to severe (AOR = 2.21; 95% CI: 1.40–3.49). Fewer than one in two OCGs utilized labour pain management methods. Individual caregiver characteristics (sex, profession, knowledge) and institutional factors (protocols, supplies, training) were associated with labour pain relief utilization among obstetric caregivers.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Debre Tabor University (ET), Debre Markos University (ET)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.