Multidisciplinarity is vital to pandemic management and preparedness

Abstract Governments around the world sought to address the Covid-19 pandemic through a range of engagements with various kinds of experts. At the same time, some disciplinary perspectives were privileged over others. For instance, while calls were made during the pandemic for more social science expertise on advisory panels, formal mechanisms for integrating insights from these disciplines were often more limited than would have been ideal. Some governments are now undertaking inquiries to assess national responses to Covid-19, including in relation to how knowledge and evidence was leveraged during the pandemic. In the UK, the official Covid-19 inquiry is ongoing, yet reports for the first two ‘Modules’ have been published and bear scrutiny for relevant insights. Module 2 remarks on the importance of different perspectives in tackling the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the wider effects of infection on society. Moving forward, to prepare for future pandemics full engagement across a wider range of disciplines – including across the humanities and social sciences – is essential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Public Health
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-026-02267-5
Primary Topic
COVID-19 impact on air quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multidisciplinarity is vital to pandemic management and preparedness

Martyn Pickersgill
Discover Public Health
COVID-19 impact on air quality
article

Multidisciplinarity is vital to pandemic management and preparedness

Martyn Pickersgill
article en

Abstract

Abstract Governments around the world sought to address the Covid-19 pandemic through a range of engagements with various kinds of experts. At the same time, some disciplinary perspectives were privileged over others. For instance, while calls were made during the pandemic for more social science expertise on advisory panels, formal mechanisms for integrating insights from these disciplines were often more limited than would have been ideal. Some governments are now undertaking inquiries to assess national responses to Covid-19, including in relation to how knowledge and evidence was leveraged during the pandemic. In the UK, the official Covid-19 inquiry is ongoing, yet reports for the first two ‘Modules’ have been published and bear scrutiny for relevant insights. Module 2 remarks on the importance of different perspectives in tackling the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the wider effects of infection on society. Moving forward, to prepare for future pandemics full engagement across a wider range of disciplines – including across the humanities and social sciences – is essential.

Discover Public HealthVol. 23(1)
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
COVID-19 impact on air quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.