Maintenance Pemetrexed/Pembrolizumab Versus Pembrolizumab in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score–Weighted Analysis

PURPOSE Pemetrexed remains part of guideline-recommended maintenance pemetrexed/pembrolizumab in advanced/metastatic non–oncogene-driven nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether pemetrexed contributes to the combination's survival benefit is unknown. In this propensity-weighted analysis of US Veterans Affairs data, we compared real-world effectiveness and safety of maintenance pemetrexed/pembrolizumab versus maintenance pembrolizumab alone and estimated US government payer spending on maintenance pemetrexed. METHODS We identified Veterans who received four cycles of carboplatin/cisplatin, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab followed by at least one dose of maintenance pemetrexed/pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab. A propensity-weighted Cox model was used to adjust for baseline between-group differences using inverse probability of treatment weights. The primary effectiveness outcome was overall survival (OS; time from first maintenance dose to death). The primary financial outcome was the estimated spending on maintenance pemetrexed across VA, Medicare Part B, and Medicaid (2017-2022). RESULTS The real-world outcomes cohort included 622 patients (473 pemetrexed/pembrolizumab; 149 pembrolizumab alone). After propensity weighting, pemetrexed was not associated with improved OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] pemetrexed/pembrolizumab v pembrolizumab, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.83 to 1.36, P = .62]) but was associated with higher toxicity risk (grade ≥3 acute kidney injury [aHR 3.35, 95% CI, 1.08 to 10.41, P = .04]; neutropenia [aHR 2.86, 95% CI, 1.44 to 3.05; P = .004]; anemia [aHR 1.65, 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.47, P = .014]). Findings were robust to sensitivity analysis in which patients who crossed over from pembrolizumab to pemetrexed/pembrolizumab were excluded. Estimated government payer spending on maintenance pemetrexed from 2017 to 2022 totaled $1.588 billion (2024 USD). CONCLUSION Adding pemetrexed to maintenance pembrolizumab was not associated with improved survival but was associated with increased toxicity. Reassessing legacy chemotherapy components may improve the safety and cost-effectiveness of cancer care . Prospective evaluation of maintenance pemetrexed's incremental benefit in NSCLC in the immunotherapy era is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op-25-01241
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maintenance Pemetrexed/Pembrolizumab Versus Pembrolizumab in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score–Weighted Analysis

Molly C. Tokaz, S. Jalal, Timothy P. Hofer, Michael J. Kelley et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

Maintenance Pemetrexed/Pembrolizumab Versus Pembrolizumab in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score–Weighted Analysis

Molly C. Tokaz, S. Jalal, Timothy P. Hofer, Michael J. Kelley, Brian Bazzell, Garth William Strohbehn, Hannah F. Tavalire, Alex K. Bryant, Daniel Sanghoon Shin, A. Mark Fendrick, Derek J. Gyori, Julie Moeller, Nithya Ramnath, David A. Elliott
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE Pemetrexed remains part of guideline-recommended maintenance pemetrexed/pembrolizumab in advanced/metastatic non–oncogene-driven nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether pemetrexed contributes to the combination's survival benefit is unknown. In this propensity-weighted analysis of US Veterans Affairs data, we compared real-world effectiveness and safety of maintenance pemetrexed/pembrolizumab versus maintenance pembrolizumab alone and estimated US government payer spending on maintenance pemetrexed. METHODS We identified Veterans who received four cycles of carboplatin/cisplatin, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab followed by at least one dose of maintenance pemetrexed/pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab. A propensity-weighted Cox model was used to adjust for baseline between-group differences using inverse probability of treatment weights. The primary effectiveness outcome was overall survival (OS; time from first maintenance dose to death). The primary financial outcome was the estimated spending on maintenance pemetrexed across VA, Medicare Part B, and Medicaid (2017-2022). RESULTS The real-world outcomes cohort included 622 patients (473 pemetrexed/pembrolizumab; 149 pembrolizumab alone). After propensity weighting, pemetrexed was not associated with improved OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] pemetrexed/pembrolizumab v pembrolizumab, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.83 to 1.36, P = .62]) but was associated with higher toxicity risk (grade ≥3 acute kidney injury [aHR 3.35, 95% CI, 1.08 to 10.41, P = .04]; neutropenia [aHR 2.86, 95% CI, 1.44 to 3.05; P = .004]; anemia [aHR 1.65, 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.47, P = .014]). Findings were robust to sensitivity analysis in which patients who crossed over from pembrolizumab to pemetrexed/pembrolizumab were excluded. Estimated government payer spending on maintenance pemetrexed from 2017 to 2022 totaled $1.588 billion (2024 USD). CONCLUSION Adding pemetrexed to maintenance pembrolizumab was not associated with improved survival but was associated with increased toxicity. Reassessing legacy chemotherapy components may improve the safety and cost-effectiveness of cancer care . Prospective evaluation of maintenance pemetrexed's incremental benefit in NSCLC in the immunotherapy era is needed.

JCO Oncology Practice
Indiana University Health (US), Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), University of Washington (US), University of Michigan (US), The Coordinating Center (US), VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US), Indiana Cancer Consortium (US), Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center (US), VA Connecticut Research and Education Foundation (US), Michigan Medicine (US), VA Center for Clinical Management Research (US), Durham VA Health Care System (US), Ann Arbor VA Medical Center (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Center for Global Health (US), Center for Health and Gender Equity (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.