Implementation of healthcare guidelines in public health: an umbrella review

BACKGROUND: Healthcare guidelines are intended to standardize health practitioners' practice and improve patient outcomes, yet their implementation in public health is often inconsistent. This umbrella review aimed to identify barriers and facilitators influencing guideline implementation and to provide an overview of effective strategies to enhance guideline adherence in public health. METHODS: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses, published between 2014 and 2024, were identified through searches in PubMed (Q4 2024) and Scopus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Database (Q2 2026). After applying the inclusion criteria, these were assessed for methodological quality using the AMSTAR-2 tool. Barriers, facilitators, and strategies were categorized using the Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations (MIDI) framework to provide a comprehensive overview. RESULTS: Thirteen systematic reviews were included, most of which conducted qualitative syntheses, with only one meta-analysis identified. Organizational determinants were the most frequently reported barriers, including limited resources, insufficient coordination, and lack of management support. Factors related to healthcare professionals, such as perceived relevance of guidelines and alignment with practice, also influenced implementation. Facilitators included perceived usefulness of guidelines, professional engagement, and social support. A wide range of implementation strategies was identified, targeting organizational structures, end-users, and guideline characteristics. Educational approaches were the most applied but showed inconsistent effectiveness, especially when used in isolation. Evidence on the added value of multi-component strategies was mixed, with no single approach consistently associated with successful implementation. CONCLUSION: Effective implementation of healthcare guidelines in public health requires a comprehensive approach addressing context-specific determinants. Although implementation challenges are shared across healthcare, the structural characteristics of public health often amplify organizational and end-user barriers. No single strategy ensures consistent success; instead, effectiveness depends on tailoring implementation efforts to specific settings and determinants. Further high-quality research is needed to identify effective implementation strategies and bridge the gap between evidence and daily public health practice. REGISTRATION: This umbrella review was not registered in a publicly accessible database prior to its conduct.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28065-x
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation of healthcare guidelines in public health: an umbrella review

C.I. Lanting, Jacqueline A. Deurloo, Hristiyanna I. Ivanova
BMC Public Health
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Implementation of healthcare guidelines in public health: an umbrella review

C.I. Lanting, Jacqueline A. Deurloo, Hristiyanna I. Ivanova
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthcare guidelines are intended to standardize health practitioners' practice and improve patient outcomes, yet their implementation in public health is often inconsistent. This umbrella review aimed to identify barriers and facilitators influencing guideline implementation and to provide an overview of effective strategies to enhance guideline adherence in public health. METHODS: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses, published between 2014 and 2024, were identified through searches in PubMed (Q4 2024) and Scopus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Database (Q2 2026). After applying the inclusion criteria, these were assessed for methodological quality using the AMSTAR-2 tool. Barriers, facilitators, and strategies were categorized using the Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations (MIDI) framework to provide a comprehensive overview. RESULTS: Thirteen systematic reviews were included, most of which conducted qualitative syntheses, with only one meta-analysis identified. Organizational determinants were the most frequently reported barriers, including limited resources, insufficient coordination, and lack of management support. Factors related to healthcare professionals, such as perceived relevance of guidelines and alignment with practice, also influenced implementation. Facilitators included perceived usefulness of guidelines, professional engagement, and social support. A wide range of implementation strategies was identified, targeting organizational structures, end-users, and guideline characteristics. Educational approaches were the most applied but showed inconsistent effectiveness, especially when used in isolation. Evidence on the added value of multi-component strategies was mixed, with no single approach consistently associated with successful implementation. CONCLUSION: Effective implementation of healthcare guidelines in public health requires a comprehensive approach addressing context-specific determinants. Although implementation challenges are shared across healthcare, the structural characteristics of public health often amplify organizational and end-user barriers. No single strategy ensures consistent success; instead, effectiveness depends on tailoring implementation efforts to specific settings and determinants. Further high-quality research is needed to identify effective implementation strategies and bridge the gap between evidence and daily public health practice. REGISTRATION: This umbrella review was not registered in a publicly accessible database prior to its conduct.

BMC Public Health
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.