Attention-Based Performance Validity Assessment in Paediatric Samples

Neuropsychological assessments require adequate task engagement, yet paediatric performance validity testing (PVT) remains limited. This study evaluated the Groningen Effort Test (GET) as an attention-based PVT in children and adolescents using a simulation design. Participants were typically developing controls ( N = 113), instructed simulators ( N = 40) and outpatient referrals ( N = 47), aged 6–17 years, who completed the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM Trial-1), Reliable Digit Span (RDS) and the GET. GET performance improved with age, and outpatient referrals scored below controls. Age-stratified cutoffs (<13 years vs. >13 years) produced high specificity and strong sensitivity in children, comparable to TOMM Trial-1 and RDS, while all PVTs showed reduced sensitivity in adolescents. ROC analyses indicated excellent accuracy in children and good to moderate accuracy in adolescents. Regression analyses revealed significant GET effects of group and age. Findings support the GET as a promising paediatric PVT requiring further clinical validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Assessment
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911261452115
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attention-Based Performance Validity Assessment in Paediatric Samples

Anselm B. M. Fuermaier, Björn Albrecht, Hanna Christiansen, Johanna Kneidinger et al.
Assessment
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

Attention-Based Performance Validity Assessment in Paediatric Samples

Anselm B. M. Fuermaier, Björn Albrecht, Hanna Christiansen, Johanna Kneidinger, Emily Raasch
article en

Abstract

Neuropsychological assessments require adequate task engagement, yet paediatric performance validity testing (PVT) remains limited. This study evaluated the Groningen Effort Test (GET) as an attention-based PVT in children and adolescents using a simulation design. Participants were typically developing controls ( N = 113), instructed simulators ( N = 40) and outpatient referrals ( N = 47), aged 6–17 years, who completed the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM Trial-1), Reliable Digit Span (RDS) and the GET. GET performance improved with age, and outpatient referrals scored below controls. Age-stratified cutoffs (<13 years vs. >13 years) produced high specificity and strong sensitivity in children, comparable to TOMM Trial-1 and RDS, while all PVTs showed reduced sensitivity in adolescents. ROC analyses indicated excellent accuracy in children and good to moderate accuracy in adolescents. Regression analyses revealed significant GET effects of group and age. Findings support the GET as a promising paediatric PVT requiring further clinical validation.

Assessment
Philipps University of Marburg (DE), University of Groningen (NL)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.