Visual Recognition of Coal–Biomass Blend Ratios on a Conveyor Belt Using YOLO-Series Models with Oriented Bounding Boxes

Real-time perception of coal–biomass blending during conveyor-belt transport remains challenging because of local aggregation, particle overlap, and illumination variation. In this study, a laboratory-scale conveyor-belt image dataset covering different coal mass fractions, illumination conditions, and particle sizes was constructed. Whole-image classification, cropped-ROI classification, direct regression, horizontal bounding box (HBB)-based detection, oriented bounding box (OBB)-based detection, and RT-DETR-L detection baselines were compared using YOLO-series and auxiliary models. Coal mass fraction was estimated using a frequency-weighted statistical strategy that converts frame-level predictions into continuous estimates. YOLOv8-cls achieved an average RMSE of 13.98 percentage points (pp), indicating the influence of background interference in whole-image classification. Among HBB models, YOLOv8m achieved the lowest mean RMSE of 6.10 pp but required higher computational cost. Compared with YOLOv8n, YOLOv8n-OBB reduced the average RMSE from 9.02 to 6.90 pp by providing a more compact material-region representation and reducing background redundancy. These results show that OBB representation improves the stability of lightweight models. The proposed method provides a feasible vision-based soft-sensing approach for online trend monitoring of coal–biomass blending under lightweight deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14121979
Primary Topic
Mineral Processing and Grinding
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visual Recognition of Coal–Biomass Blend Ratios on a Conveyor Belt Using YOLO-Series Models with Oriented Bounding Boxes

Zhimin Lü, C Z Zhang, Xiaolong Wu, H Yang et al.
Processes
Mineral Processing and Grinding
article

Visual Recognition of Coal–Biomass Blend Ratios on a Conveyor Belt Using YOLO-Series Models with Oriented Bounding Boxes

Zhimin Lü, C Z Zhang, Xiaolong Wu, H Yang, Zhilong Ruan, Yisheng Mao, Haibing Pu, Xu Huang, Weihui Liao
article en

Abstract

Real-time perception of coal–biomass blending during conveyor-belt transport remains challenging because of local aggregation, particle overlap, and illumination variation. In this study, a laboratory-scale conveyor-belt image dataset covering different coal mass fractions, illumination conditions, and particle sizes was constructed. Whole-image classification, cropped-ROI classification, direct regression, horizontal bounding box (HBB)-based detection, oriented bounding box (OBB)-based detection, and RT-DETR-L detection baselines were compared using YOLO-series and auxiliary models. Coal mass fraction was estimated using a frequency-weighted statistical strategy that converts frame-level predictions into continuous estimates. YOLOv8-cls achieved an average RMSE of 13.98 percentage points (pp), indicating the influence of background interference in whole-image classification. Among HBB models, YOLOv8m achieved the lowest mean RMSE of 6.10 pp but required higher computational cost. Compared with YOLOv8n, YOLOv8n-OBB reduced the average RMSE from 9.02 to 6.90 pp by providing a more compact material-region representation and reducing background redundancy. These results show that OBB representation improves the stability of lightweight models. The proposed method provides a feasible vision-based soft-sensing approach for online trend monitoring of coal–biomass blending under lightweight deployment.

ProcessesVol. 14(12)
China General Nuclear Power Corporation (China) (CN), Thermal Power Research Institute (CN), Guangdong Hydropower Planning & Design Institute (CN), State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University (CN), South China University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Mineral Processing and Grinding
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.