Analysing the costs of teaching in universities through structural cost profiling

Abstract Understanding the structural drivers of teaching cost is a persistent challenge in higher education systems internationally, including in Australia. To extend research on cost heterogeneity and structural cost drivers, we develop and apply a Structural Cost Profiling (SCP) approach, based on Latent Class Analysis (LCA), to analyse 189,811 ‘units of study’ records from 12 Australian universities. Centring on cost per enrolled student, we identify eight distinct cost profiles that capture systematic, multidimensional variation in staffing, enrolment scale, delivery mode and campus location. While the data show significant variation across the dimensions, our analysis demonstrates that cost heterogeneity is not random but structured, with higher average costs per student typically associated with configurations such as (1) regional delivery with small cohorts and labour-intensive postgraduate provision, whereas (2) lower costs emerge from scale-based online delivery models. A separability analysis shows that staffing allocation, salary expenditure and teaching hours are the indicators most strongly aligned with the latent classes, while categorisations such as discipline (Field of Education) or delivery mode play a more limited and contextual role in differentiating the cost classes, instead helping to indicate where particular cost profiles occur, rather than defining those profiles on their own. These results suggest the need for clarity around the intentions and purposes of funding policies, which risk over- or under-funding where cost structures are assumed without an evidence base.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-026-01690-6
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysing the costs of teaching in universities through structural cost profiling

Mark Rahimi, Gwilym Croucher
Higher Education
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
article

Analysing the costs of teaching in universities through structural cost profiling

Mark Rahimi, Gwilym Croucher
article en

Abstract

Abstract Understanding the structural drivers of teaching cost is a persistent challenge in higher education systems internationally, including in Australia. To extend research on cost heterogeneity and structural cost drivers, we develop and apply a Structural Cost Profiling (SCP) approach, based on Latent Class Analysis (LCA), to analyse 189,811 ‘units of study’ records from 12 Australian universities. Centring on cost per enrolled student, we identify eight distinct cost profiles that capture systematic, multidimensional variation in staffing, enrolment scale, delivery mode and campus location. While the data show significant variation across the dimensions, our analysis demonstrates that cost heterogeneity is not random but structured, with higher average costs per student typically associated with configurations such as (1) regional delivery with small cohorts and labour-intensive postgraduate provision, whereas (2) lower costs emerge from scale-based online delivery models. A separability analysis shows that staffing allocation, salary expenditure and teaching hours are the indicators most strongly aligned with the latent classes, while categorisations such as discipline (Field of Education) or delivery mode play a more limited and contextual role in differentiating the cost classes, instead helping to indicate where particular cost profiles occur, rather than defining those profiles on their own. These results suggest the need for clarity around the intentions and purposes of funding policies, which risk over- or under-funding where cost structures are assumed without an evidence base.

Higher Education
The University of Melbourne (AU)
University of Melbourne
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.