Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Trajectory and Long-Term Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND: Data are lacking on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) trajectory following myocardial infarction (MI). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of LVEF trajectory after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for MI on long-term outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing PCI for MI (2007-2022) with serial echocardiograms were identified in the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry and the UC San Diego internal National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry. All-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization within 6 years were assessed with time-to-event analysis adjusted for baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Of 13,439 patients (mean age 64 ± 10 years, 24.5% female, 46.8% ST-segment elevation MI), 28.2% had consistently reduced LVEF (redEF), 14.8% recovered their LVEF (recEF), 53.0% had consistently preserved LVEF (pEF), and 3.9% decreased from preserved to reduced LVEF (decEF). Heart failure hospitalization rates were 40.0% for redEF, 30.4% for decEF, 16.1% for recEF, and 6.4% for pEF (P < 0.001). Compared to pEF, the heart failure hospitalization risk was significantly higher for redEF (adjusted HR [aHR]: 8.49; 95% CI: 7.49-9.64; P < 0.001), decEF (aHR: 5.74; 95% CI: 4.69-7.02; P < 0.001), and recEF (aHR: 3.18; 95% CI: 2.70-3.76; P < 0.001). Mortality rates were 14.0% for redEF, 14.9% for decEF, 7.8% for recEF, and 6.7% for pEF (P < 0.001). Compared to pEF, the mortality risk was significantly higher for redEF (aHR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.86-2.59; P < 0.001), decEF (aHR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.56-2.82; P < 0.001), and recEF (aHR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.02-1.65; P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: LVEF trajectory after MI significantly impacts long-term outcomes. Even patients with LVEF recovery remain at increased risk for heart failure hospitalization and mortality compared to those with pEF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JACC Advances
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.102881
Primary Topic
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Trajectory and Long-Term Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Myocardial Infarction

Ehtisham Mahmud, Belal Al Khiami, Revathy Sampath-Kumar, Ryan Reeves et al.
JACC Advances
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
article

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Trajectory and Long-Term Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Myocardial Infarction

Ehtisham Mahmud, Belal Al Khiami, Revathy Sampath-Kumar, Ryan Reeves, Ori Ben‐Yehuda, Sacharias von Koch, Moman A. Mohammad, Anna Melendez, David Erlinge, Anna Fenerty, Lawrence Ang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data are lacking on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) trajectory following myocardial infarction (MI). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of LVEF trajectory after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for MI on long-term outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing PCI for MI (2007-2022) with serial echocardiograms were identified in the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry and the UC San Diego internal National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry. All-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization within 6 years were assessed with time-to-event analysis adjusted for baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Of 13,439 patients (mean age 64 ± 10 years, 24.5% female, 46.8% ST-segment elevation MI), 28.2% had consistently reduced LVEF (redEF), 14.8% recovered their LVEF (recEF), 53.0% had consistently preserved LVEF (pEF), and 3.9% decreased from preserved to reduced LVEF (decEF). Heart failure hospitalization rates were 40.0% for redEF, 30.4% for decEF, 16.1% for recEF, and 6.4% for pEF (P < 0.001). Compared to pEF, the heart failure hospitalization risk was significantly higher for redEF (adjusted HR [aHR]: 8.49; 95% CI: 7.49-9.64; P < 0.001), decEF (aHR: 5.74; 95% CI: 4.69-7.02; P < 0.001), and recEF (aHR: 3.18; 95% CI: 2.70-3.76; P < 0.001). Mortality rates were 14.0% for redEF, 14.9% for decEF, 7.8% for recEF, and 6.7% for pEF (P < 0.001). Compared to pEF, the mortality risk was significantly higher for redEF (aHR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.86-2.59; P < 0.001), decEF (aHR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.56-2.82; P < 0.001), and recEF (aHR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.02-1.65; P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: LVEF trajectory after MI significantly impacts long-term outcomes. Even patients with LVEF recovery remain at increased risk for heart failure hospitalization and mortality compared to those with pEF.

JACC AdvancesVol. 5(7)
Lund University (SE), Cardiovascular Institute of the South (US), UC San Diego Health System (US), Skåne University Hospital (SE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.