The Participatory Institutional Capacity Assessment and Learning (PICAL) index, its adaptation in the democratic republic of the congo, and lessons learned

The purpose of this study is to share lessons learned and recommendations from the adaptation of Participatory Institutional Capacity Assessment and Learning (PICAL) tool used by the United States Agency for International Development’s (USAID) Integrated Health Program (IHP) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). The PICAL tool assesses, monitors, and evaluates institutional capacity building across four categories: Demand for Institutional Performance, Organizational Learning Capacity, Administrative Capacity, and Systems Strengthening Capacity. Each category of PICAL is subdivided into sub-categories, and all sub-categories are evaluated using a six-point scale. Through USAID IHP, PICAL has been field-tested and used in nine provinces and 45 health zones in the DRC. Qualitative findings from key informant interviews suggest that use of PICAL contributed to institutional capacity strengthening. Lessons learned from this study underscore the importance of sustaining regular and long-term follow-ups, adapting the tool to an institution’s context, engaging with health leaders, and providing financial support to ensure long-term improvement and sustainability. This study is crucial in informing other projects and program implementers about PICAL and its potential to enhance institutional capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evaluation and Program Planning
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2026.102799
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Participatory Institutional Capacity Assessment and Learning (PICAL) index, its adaptation in the democratic republic of the congo, and lessons learned

Sahra Ibrahimi, Alexandre Dumouza, Rani Duff, Narcisse Embeke et al.
Evaluation and Program Planning
Global Maternal and Child Health
article

The Participatory Institutional Capacity Assessment and Learning (PICAL) index, its adaptation in the democratic republic of the congo, and lessons learned

Sahra Ibrahimi, Alexandre Dumouza, Rani Duff, Narcisse Embeke, Bettina Brunner, Houleymata Diarra, Dorothea Hertzberg, Basile Yangala, Graeme Frelick
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to share lessons learned and recommendations from the adaptation of Participatory Institutional Capacity Assessment and Learning (PICAL) tool used by the United States Agency for International Development’s (USAID) Integrated Health Program (IHP) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). The PICAL tool assesses, monitors, and evaluates institutional capacity building across four categories: Demand for Institutional Performance, Organizational Learning Capacity, Administrative Capacity, and Systems Strengthening Capacity. Each category of PICAL is subdivided into sub-categories, and all sub-categories are evaluated using a six-point scale. Through USAID IHP, PICAL has been field-tested and used in nine provinces and 45 health zones in the DRC. Qualitative findings from key informant interviews suggest that use of PICAL contributed to institutional capacity strengthening. Lessons learned from this study underscore the importance of sustaining regular and long-term follow-ups, adapting the tool to an institution’s context, engaging with health leaders, and providing financial support to ensure long-term improvement and sustainability. This study is crucial in informing other projects and program implementers about PICAL and its potential to enhance institutional capacity.

Evaluation and Program PlanningVol. 118
Center for Global Development (US), Denison University (US)
United States Agency for International Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Global Maternal and Child Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.