Session 18. Oral Presentation for: Psychosocial risk management: learnings and key takeaways from running hazard identification workshops focusing on psychosocial management for a large energy technology equipment and service provider

Presented on 20 May 2026: Session 18 Psychosocial risk management has become an increasingly important focus across industry, driven by evolving regulatory requirements, shifting safety expectations, and a growing recognition of the impact of work-related stress on employee wellbeing and organisational performance. Operating within the high-risk energy sector, Baker Hughes (BH) faces diverse psychosocial challenges across its office-based workforce, remote field service engineers, workshop technicians, and employees working from home. These groups experience varying degrees of workload intensity, autonomy, isolation, and exposure to stressful or complex operational environments. In response to these challenges and the strengthening legislative landscape, BH developed a Psychosocial Risk Guideline in 2025 to embed psychosocial hazards within its Work Health and Safety framework. This paper examines the design and implementation of a series of psychosocial Hazard Identification workshops aimed at identifying cohort-specific hazards and evaluating the effectiveness of existing controls. The workshops incorporated representative participation across all workforce cohorts and used structured facilitation, breakout discussions, and an enhanced psychosocial risk matrix to enable deeper exploration of nuanced hazards. The process highlighted unique complexities associated with psychosocial risks – particularly the influence of individual characteristics, societal factors, and organisational culture – while also revealing barriers such as entrenched industry norms, survivorship bias, and limited understanding of the distinction between risk mitigation and elimination. Approximately 100 improvement actions were generated, reflecting strong employee engagement and providing targeted opportunities to strengthen psychosocial controls. The findings demonstrate that meaningful psychosocial risk management is achievable when organisations adopt tailored workshop methodologies, prioritise inclusive consultation, and build capability to navigate the unique complexities of psychosocial hazards. To access the Oral Presentation click ‘Supplementary data’ below. To read the full paper click here

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Energy Producers journal.
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/ep26538
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Session 18. Oral Presentation for: Psychosocial risk management: learnings and key takeaways from running hazard identification workshops focusing on psychosocial management for a large energy technology equipment and service provider

Simone Ceccanti
Australian Energy Producers journal.
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

Session 18. Oral Presentation for: Psychosocial risk management: learnings and key takeaways from running hazard identification workshops focusing on psychosocial management for a large energy technology equipment and service provider

Simone Ceccanti
article en

Abstract

Presented on 20 May 2026: Session 18 Psychosocial risk management has become an increasingly important focus across industry, driven by evolving regulatory requirements, shifting safety expectations, and a growing recognition of the impact of work-related stress on employee wellbeing and organisational performance. Operating within the high-risk energy sector, Baker Hughes (BH) faces diverse psychosocial challenges across its office-based workforce, remote field service engineers, workshop technicians, and employees working from home. These groups experience varying degrees of workload intensity, autonomy, isolation, and exposure to stressful or complex operational environments. In response to these challenges and the strengthening legislative landscape, BH developed a Psychosocial Risk Guideline in 2025 to embed psychosocial hazards within its Work Health and Safety framework. This paper examines the design and implementation of a series of psychosocial Hazard Identification workshops aimed at identifying cohort-specific hazards and evaluating the effectiveness of existing controls. The workshops incorporated representative participation across all workforce cohorts and used structured facilitation, breakout discussions, and an enhanced psychosocial risk matrix to enable deeper exploration of nuanced hazards. The process highlighted unique complexities associated with psychosocial risks – particularly the influence of individual characteristics, societal factors, and organisational culture – while also revealing barriers such as entrenched industry norms, survivorship bias, and limited understanding of the distinction between risk mitigation and elimination. Approximately 100 improvement actions were generated, reflecting strong employee engagement and providing targeted opportunities to strengthen psychosocial controls. The findings demonstrate that meaningful psychosocial risk management is achievable when organisations adopt tailored workshop methodologies, prioritise inclusive consultation, and build capability to navigate the unique complexities of psychosocial hazards. To access the Oral Presentation click ‘Supplementary data’ below. To read the full paper click here

Australian Energy Producers journal.Vol. 66(S2)
Baker Hughes (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.