Occupational standing, walking and forward bending during pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage: a Danish nationwide, register-based, cohort study

Objective We aimed to investigate the association between occupational standing, walking and forward bending during pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage. Methods This register-based study examined all labour-active pregnant women in Denmark between 2004 and 2018, comprising 803 829 pregnancies among 475 312 women. Occupational exposure to standing, walking and forward bending ≥30° was assessed with a quantitative, pregnancy-specific job exposure matrix, based on the woman’s occupational code in the occupational and industry register, at the year of pregnancy start. Information on miscarriage was retrieved from the Danish National Patient Register (DNPR). Statistics Denmark, the Danish Medical Birth Registry and the DNPR provided information on potential confounders. Absence data, sourced from the Danish Register for Evaluation and Marginalisation (DREAM), were assessed as an effect modifier. We estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) using Cox regression. Results All three exposures were associated with increased hazards for miscarriage. The aHR for miscarriage was 1.03 (95% CI: 1.02 to 1.04) per additional hour of occupational standing , 1.18 (95% CI: 1.15 to 1.22) per additional hour of occupational walking and 1.36 (95% CI: 1.30 to 1.41) per additional hour of occupational forward bending . The aHR was more pronounced among women with absence from work the preceding week than among those without. Post hoc quartile analyses indicated a consistent exposure–response relationship for forward bending, while the associations for standing and walking decreased at the highest quartile. Conclusions We found an elevated risk of miscarriage associated with all three occupational exposures. Replication in comparable populations incorporating smoking status and other health information is needed to validate these associations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-110712
Primary Topic
Pregnancy-related medical research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Occupational standing, walking and forward bending during pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage: a Danish nationwide, register-based, cohort study

Luise Mølenberg Begtrup, Jonathan Aavang Petersen, Laura Deen, Hannah Nørtoft Frankel et al.
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Pregnancy-related medical research
article

Occupational standing, walking and forward bending during pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage: a Danish nationwide, register-based, cohort study

Luise Mølenberg Begtrup, Jonathan Aavang Petersen, Laura Deen, Hannah Nørtoft Frankel, Esben Meulengracht Flachs, Mette Korshøj, Jens Peter Bonde, Camilla Sandal Sejbæk, Sandra Soegaard Toettenborg, Christina Bach Lund
article en

Abstract

Objective We aimed to investigate the association between occupational standing, walking and forward bending during pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage. Methods This register-based study examined all labour-active pregnant women in Denmark between 2004 and 2018, comprising 803 829 pregnancies among 475 312 women. Occupational exposure to standing, walking and forward bending ≥30° was assessed with a quantitative, pregnancy-specific job exposure matrix, based on the woman’s occupational code in the occupational and industry register, at the year of pregnancy start. Information on miscarriage was retrieved from the Danish National Patient Register (DNPR). Statistics Denmark, the Danish Medical Birth Registry and the DNPR provided information on potential confounders. Absence data, sourced from the Danish Register for Evaluation and Marginalisation (DREAM), were assessed as an effect modifier. We estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) using Cox regression. Results All three exposures were associated with increased hazards for miscarriage. The aHR for miscarriage was 1.03 (95% CI: 1.02 to 1.04) per additional hour of occupational standing , 1.18 (95% CI: 1.15 to 1.22) per additional hour of occupational walking and 1.36 (95% CI: 1.30 to 1.41) per additional hour of occupational forward bending . The aHR was more pronounced among women with absence from work the preceding week than among those without. Post hoc quartile analyses indicated a consistent exposure–response relationship for forward bending, while the associations for standing and walking decreased at the highest quartile. Conclusions We found an elevated risk of miscarriage associated with all three occupational exposures. Replication in comparable populations incorporating smoking status and other health information is needed to validate these associations.

Occupational and Environmental Medicine
University of Copenhagen (DK), Bispebjerg Hospital (DK), Holbæk Sygehus (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Pregnancy-related medical research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.