Targeting Extended Thromboprophylaxis after Surgery Through Multidimensional Dynamic Pulmonary Embolism Risk Assessment: Development and Temporal Validation in 4.8 Million Operations

BACKGROUND: Extended thromboprophylaxis reduces postoperative venous thromboembolism but is inconsistently used because pulmonary embolism (PE) risk varies across operations and may change after discharge. We developed and temporally validated a two-stage calculator to estimate PE risk at discharge and update risk after unplanned readmission or reoperation. STUDY DESIGN: ACS-NSQIP adult operations from 2020-2023 were used for development (n=3,864,605), with 2024 operations reserved for temporal validation (n=956,434). The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative PE. Penalized logistic regression modeled discharge risk using patient, surgical, and early postoperative variables; dynamic reassessment added timing of first unplanned readmission and reoperation. A prespecified 0.5% predicted-risk threshold was evaluated. RESULTS: Among 4,856,597 operations, 17,045 patients developed PE (0.35%). In temporal validation, the discharge model demonstrated AUC 0.811 (95% CI, 0.801-0.818), calibration slope 1.024, and intercept 0.036. Dynamic reassessment improved discrimination to AUC 0.892 (95% CI, 0.887-0.897), with calibration slope 0.991 and intercept 0.030. Among 57,840 patients with an unplanned-return event, reassessment moved 24,320 patients above the 0.5% treatment-consideration threshold despite being below threshold at discharge. This newly flagged group had 711 observed PEs, a 2.92% PE rate, and 1 PE within 30 days for every 34.2 newly flagged patients under usual care. Sensitivity analyses indicated that unplanned-return occurrence, rather than exact postoperative day, was the durable risk signal. CONCLUSIONS: Across adult surgery, dynamic PE reassessment after unplanned readmission or reoperation identifies an actionable high-risk postoperative state not captured at discharge. This surgeon-facing calculator can make extended-prophylaxis reconsideration reproducible when prevention remains possible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/xcs.0000000000002074
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Targeting Extended Thromboprophylaxis after Surgery Through Multidimensional Dynamic Pulmonary Embolism Risk Assessment: Development and Temporal Validation in 4.8 Million Operations

Ramsey M. Dallal, Luis H. Eraso, Geno J. Merli, Michael Li et al.
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

Targeting Extended Thromboprophylaxis after Surgery Through Multidimensional Dynamic Pulmonary Embolism Risk Assessment: Development and Temporal Validation in 4.8 Million Operations

Ramsey M. Dallal, Luis H. Eraso, Geno J. Merli, Michael Li, Benjamin Moran, Jeffrey Riggio
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extended thromboprophylaxis reduces postoperative venous thromboembolism but is inconsistently used because pulmonary embolism (PE) risk varies across operations and may change after discharge. We developed and temporally validated a two-stage calculator to estimate PE risk at discharge and update risk after unplanned readmission or reoperation. STUDY DESIGN: ACS-NSQIP adult operations from 2020-2023 were used for development (n=3,864,605), with 2024 operations reserved for temporal validation (n=956,434). The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative PE. Penalized logistic regression modeled discharge risk using patient, surgical, and early postoperative variables; dynamic reassessment added timing of first unplanned readmission and reoperation. A prespecified 0.5% predicted-risk threshold was evaluated. RESULTS: Among 4,856,597 operations, 17,045 patients developed PE (0.35%). In temporal validation, the discharge model demonstrated AUC 0.811 (95% CI, 0.801-0.818), calibration slope 1.024, and intercept 0.036. Dynamic reassessment improved discrimination to AUC 0.892 (95% CI, 0.887-0.897), with calibration slope 0.991 and intercept 0.030. Among 57,840 patients with an unplanned-return event, reassessment moved 24,320 patients above the 0.5% treatment-consideration threshold despite being below threshold at discharge. This newly flagged group had 711 observed PEs, a 2.92% PE rate, and 1 PE within 30 days for every 34.2 newly flagged patients under usual care. Sensitivity analyses indicated that unplanned-return occurrence, rather than exact postoperative day, was the durable risk signal. CONCLUSIONS: Across adult surgery, dynamic PE reassessment after unplanned readmission or reoperation identifies an actionable high-risk postoperative state not captured at discharge. This surgeon-facing calculator can make extended-prophylaxis reconsideration reproducible when prevention remains possible.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Thomas Jefferson University (US), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (US), Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.