Echoes of memory: discouraging robust past experience in perception

Temporal Realism (TR) advances two interlocking theses: (1) certain hallucinations are not about nothing but indeed are experiences of past-perceived objects, and (2) long-term memory functions as an integrated sensory modality so that every perceptual episode partly presents the past. Together, these form a robust account of the mind and world. In this paper I argue that both theses founder on the same two defects. First, they overextend causal ancestry into intentional content, rendering experience disconnected from epistemic grip or phenomenal clue. Second, they dissolve essential phenomenological and functional boundaries between hallucination and imagination and between sensory modality and memory, thus undercutting the distinctions that make perception cognitively and clinically intelligible. I sketch a modest hybrid alternative in which memory remains causally indispensable yet phenomenally backgrounded, shaping but not injecting discrete past entities or patterns into our current phenomenal experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Synthese
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-026-05654-2
Primary Topic
Memory Processes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Echoes of memory: discouraging robust past experience in perception

Juan José Colomina Almiñana
Synthese
Memory Processes and Influences
article

Echoes of memory: discouraging robust past experience in perception

Juan José Colomina Almiñana
article en

Abstract

Temporal Realism (TR) advances two interlocking theses: (1) certain hallucinations are not about nothing but indeed are experiences of past-perceived objects, and (2) long-term memory functions as an integrated sensory modality so that every perceptual episode partly presents the past. Together, these form a robust account of the mind and world. In this paper I argue that both theses founder on the same two defects. First, they overextend causal ancestry into intentional content, rendering experience disconnected from epistemic grip or phenomenal clue. Second, they dissolve essential phenomenological and functional boundaries between hallucination and imagination and between sensory modality and memory, thus undercutting the distinctions that make perception cognitively and clinically intelligible. I sketch a modest hybrid alternative in which memory remains causally indispensable yet phenomenally backgrounded, shaping but not injecting discrete past entities or patterns into our current phenomenal experience.

SyntheseVol. 208(1)
Mills College (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Memory Processes and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.