Factors Influencing Poor Response to Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy in Patients With Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease and Development of a Clinical-Voice Integrated Predictive Model

Objective This study aimed to systematically identify clinic-based predictors of poor proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) response in patients with suspected Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) (based on RSI >13 and RFS >7) and develop a predictive model for individualized management. Methods A retrospective cohort study analyzed suspected adult LPRD patients who were treated with standard-dose PPIs for ≥3 months from 2021-2024. Patients were stratified into PPI-responsive or non-responsive groups. Clinical characteristics, pretreatment Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) score, adherence to lifestyle modifications, findings from electronic laryngoscopy (specifically the presence of chronic hyperplastic/keratotic changes), and objective voice assessment via acoustic analysis (dichotomized as normal/abnormal) were evaluated. Independent predictors were identified via univariate and multivariate logistic regression and used to construct a predictive model. Model performance was assessed using ROC curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis in training and internal validation cohorts. Results A total of 301 patients were included. Multivariate analysis identified four independent predictors of poor PPI response: higher pretreatment RSI score (OR=1.180), low adherence to lifestyle modifications (<90%, OR=4.660), the presence of laryngoscopic hyperplastic/keratotic changes (OR=5.440), and abnormal pretreatment voice acoustic parameters (OR=2.755). The predictive model incorporating these variables demonstrated excellent discriminative ability, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.856 (95% CI: 0.805-0.907) in the training set and 0.891 (95% CI: 0.826-0.955) in the validation set. The model also showed good calibration and provided positive net benefit across a range of clinical decision thresholds. Conclusion The developed predictive model, based on readily accessible clinical, laryngoscopic, and vocal functional variables, effectively identifies suspected LPRD patients at high risk of poor PPI response. These findings are hypothesis-generating and lay the groundwork for future prospective studies to validate the model’s utility and to determine whether it can facilitate personalized management strategies in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ear Nose & Throat Journal
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613261461950
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Influencing Poor Response to Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy in Patients With Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease and Development of a Clinical-Voice Integrated Predictive Model

Xi Mei, Bing Wang, Xiangdong Guo
Ear Nose & Throat Journal
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

Factors Influencing Poor Response to Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy in Patients With Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease and Development of a Clinical-Voice Integrated Predictive Model

Xi Mei, Bing Wang, Xiangdong Guo
article en

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to systematically identify clinic-based predictors of poor proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) response in patients with suspected Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) (based on RSI >13 and RFS >7) and develop a predictive model for individualized management. Methods A retrospective cohort study analyzed suspected adult LPRD patients who were treated with standard-dose PPIs for ≥3 months from 2021-2024. Patients were stratified into PPI-responsive or non-responsive groups. Clinical characteristics, pretreatment Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) score, adherence to lifestyle modifications, findings from electronic laryngoscopy (specifically the presence of chronic hyperplastic/keratotic changes), and objective voice assessment via acoustic analysis (dichotomized as normal/abnormal) were evaluated. Independent predictors were identified via univariate and multivariate logistic regression and used to construct a predictive model. Model performance was assessed using ROC curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis in training and internal validation cohorts. Results A total of 301 patients were included. Multivariate analysis identified four independent predictors of poor PPI response: higher pretreatment RSI score (OR=1.180), low adherence to lifestyle modifications (<90%, OR=4.660), the presence of laryngoscopic hyperplastic/keratotic changes (OR=5.440), and abnormal pretreatment voice acoustic parameters (OR=2.755). The predictive model incorporating these variables demonstrated excellent discriminative ability, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.856 (95% CI: 0.805-0.907) in the training set and 0.891 (95% CI: 0.826-0.955) in the validation set. The model also showed good calibration and provided positive net benefit across a range of clinical decision thresholds. Conclusion The developed predictive model, based on readily accessible clinical, laryngoscopic, and vocal functional variables, effectively identifies suspected LPRD patients at high risk of poor PPI response. These findings are hypothesis-generating and lay the groundwork for future prospective studies to validate the model’s utility and to determine whether it can facilitate personalized management strategies in clinical practice.

Ear Nose & Throat Journal
First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.