Histological evaluation of hysterectomy specimens after NovaSure® endometrial ablation in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial carcinoma

Abstract Background Treatment with NovaSure® endometrial ablation is approved for patients with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) without evidence of malignant or premalignant lesions. This analysis addresses the rare but clinically relevant situation in which endometrial carcinoma (EC) or atypical hyperplasia (AEH) is identified histologically after endometrial ablation in premenopausal patients. Objective Histological evaluation of hysterectomy specimens with correlation to clinical parameters in patients undergoing hysterectomy after incidental histological diagnosis of AEH or EC following NovaSure® endometrial ablation. Methods A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted on more than 400 patients who underwent NovaSure® endometrial ablation at our center between January 2020 and February 2025. Patients with AEH or EC for whom subsequent hysterectomy specimens were available were included. Histological evaluation was performed and independently reviewed to assess residual endometrium, residual endometrial atypia or carcinoma, and ablation-related histomorphological changes. Results A total of 11 patients (AEH n = 8; EC n = 3) underwent subsequent hysterectomy after NovaSure® endometrial ablation. Six out of eight patients with AEH showed no residual atypia in the hysterectomy specimens (2/8 with focal residual atypia), and no residual invasive carcinoma was detected in any of the three carcinoma cases. Histopathological analysis showed pronounced postablative changes, including necrosis, fibrosis, zonation, and vascular and lymphatic alterations. Conclusion This descriptive study provides a clinicopathological characterization of patients with EC or AEH who underwent hysterectomy after endometrial ablation. In these patients, no preprocedural evidence of endometrial pathology was present, and the diagnosis was established solely through routine histopathological examination of curettage specimens obtained immediately before the ablation procedure. Histological assessment revealed pronounced changes, highlighting specific diagnostic challenges and underscoring the importance of careful patient selection and thorough diagnostic evaluation before NovaSure® ablation. Within the limitations of this study, no evidence was found that prior endometrial ablation compromises oncological outcome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-026-08497-x
Primary Topic
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Histological evaluation of hysterectomy specimens after NovaSure® endometrial ablation in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial carcinoma

Stefanie Burghaus, Julius Emons, Julia Gocke, Frederik A. Stuebs et al.
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
article

Histological evaluation of hysterectomy specimens after NovaSure® endometrial ablation in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial carcinoma

Stefanie Burghaus, Julius Emons, Julia Gocke, Frederik A. Stuebs, Patrik Poeschke, Christian Matek, M W Beckmann, Felix Heindl, Arndt Hartmann, Alaa Hamzeh, Oliver M. Schleicher
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Treatment with NovaSure® endometrial ablation is approved for patients with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) without evidence of malignant or premalignant lesions. This analysis addresses the rare but clinically relevant situation in which endometrial carcinoma (EC) or atypical hyperplasia (AEH) is identified histologically after endometrial ablation in premenopausal patients. Objective Histological evaluation of hysterectomy specimens with correlation to clinical parameters in patients undergoing hysterectomy after incidental histological diagnosis of AEH or EC following NovaSure® endometrial ablation. Methods A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted on more than 400 patients who underwent NovaSure® endometrial ablation at our center between January 2020 and February 2025. Patients with AEH or EC for whom subsequent hysterectomy specimens were available were included. Histological evaluation was performed and independently reviewed to assess residual endometrium, residual endometrial atypia or carcinoma, and ablation-related histomorphological changes. Results A total of 11 patients (AEH n = 8; EC n = 3) underwent subsequent hysterectomy after NovaSure® endometrial ablation. Six out of eight patients with AEH showed no residual atypia in the hysterectomy specimens (2/8 with focal residual atypia), and no residual invasive carcinoma was detected in any of the three carcinoma cases. Histopathological analysis showed pronounced postablative changes, including necrosis, fibrosis, zonation, and vascular and lymphatic alterations. Conclusion This descriptive study provides a clinicopathological characterization of patients with EC or AEH who underwent hysterectomy after endometrial ablation. In these patients, no preprocedural evidence of endometrial pathology was present, and the diagnosis was established solely through routine histopathological examination of curettage specimens obtained immediately before the ablation procedure. Histological assessment revealed pronounced changes, highlighting specific diagnostic challenges and underscoring the importance of careful patient selection and thorough diagnostic evaluation before NovaSure® ablation. Within the limitations of this study, no evidence was found that prior endometrial ablation compromises oncological outcome.

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE), Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.