Is mCDR pollution? Rethinking pollution for the governance of marine carbon dioxide removal

Marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) is increasingly explored as component within the global response to climate change, yet its governance remains fragmented and conceptually unsettled. The London Convention and Protocol (LC/LP) provides a primary institutional home for the international governance of mCDR by regulating certain marine interventions as forms of potential pollution. While this classification is often treated as a technical or legal question, this Perspective argues that how mCDR is understood as pollution has important implications for governance. First, it argues that classifying mCDR as pollution provides an institutional anchor for precautionary oversight within LC/LP. Second, it shows that prevailing technocratic understandings of pollution are insufficient for governing mCDR. Third, it explains why recurring calls for more comprehensive and integrative governance of mCDR can be understood as responses to this conceptual mismatch. Drawing on relational conceptions of pollution, the paper reframes pollution as an activity that reconfigures social-ecological relations. In doing so, it provides a conceptual lens for interpreting ongoing developments in mCDR governance without requiring a departure from existing institutional frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth System Governance
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2026.100341
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Geoengineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is mCDR pollution? Rethinking pollution for the governance of marine carbon dioxide removal

Lina Roeschel
Earth System Governance
Climate Change and Geoengineering
article

Is mCDR pollution? Rethinking pollution for the governance of marine carbon dioxide removal

Lina Roeschel
article en

Abstract

Marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) is increasingly explored as component within the global response to climate change, yet its governance remains fragmented and conceptually unsettled. The London Convention and Protocol (LC/LP) provides a primary institutional home for the international governance of mCDR by regulating certain marine interventions as forms of potential pollution. While this classification is often treated as a technical or legal question, this Perspective argues that how mCDR is understood as pollution has important implications for governance. First, it argues that classifying mCDR as pollution provides an institutional anchor for precautionary oversight within LC/LP. Second, it shows that prevailing technocratic understandings of pollution are insufficient for governing mCDR. Third, it explains why recurring calls for more comprehensive and integrative governance of mCDR can be understood as responses to this conceptual mismatch. Drawing on relational conceptions of pollution, the paper reframes pollution as an activity that reconfigures social-ecological relations. In doing so, it provides a conceptual lens for interpreting ongoing developments in mCDR governance without requiring a departure from existing institutional frameworks.

Earth System GovernanceVol. 29
GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Climate Change and Geoengineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.