Toward smarter lean practices: a systematic review of machine learning applications in lean manufacturing

Purpose This study aims to examine how machine learning (ML) is integrated with lean manufacturing (LM) practices in manufacturing and use “Smarter Lean” as a practice-oriented descriptor for data-driven lean improvement rather than as a distinct theoretical framework. Design/methodology/approach Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted on 54 peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2010 and May 2025. The review synthesizes ML techniques, targeted lean tools, operational outcomes, enablers, barriers and emerging research gaps. Findings Supervised learning and deep learning dominate current ML–LM applications, particularly for predictive maintenance, quality control, defect detection and process monitoring. The most frequently targeted lean tools are total productive maintenance, quality control, just-in-time, and value stream mapping. Reported outcomes include improvements in defect rates, downtime, cycle time, cost efficiency and safety; however, the magnitude of these improvements varies across contexts and should not be interpreted as universally generalizable. Key enablers include high-quality data, IT and sensor infrastructure, management support and workforce readiness, while major barriers encompass system integration complexity, skill gaps, weak standardization and limited empirical validation. Originality/value Unlike prior reviews that examine Lean–Industry 4.0 or Lean Six Sigma integration at a broad technological or strategic level (e.g. Vinodh et al., 2020; Sony et al., 2020), this study offers the first focused tool-level synthesis systematically mapping specific ML techniques to individual lean practices and their implementation conditions. The review contributes to the Lean Six Sigma literature by clarifying practical integration patterns and highlighting critical future research directions concerning real-world validation, scalability, sustainability and ethical considerations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlss-02-2026-0094
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Industry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward smarter lean practices: a systematic review of machine learning applications in lean manufacturing

Ali Osman Kuşakçı, Bahar Serevan
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
Digital Transformation in Industry
article

Toward smarter lean practices: a systematic review of machine learning applications in lean manufacturing

Ali Osman Kuşakçı, Bahar Serevan
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine how machine learning (ML) is integrated with lean manufacturing (LM) practices in manufacturing and use “Smarter Lean” as a practice-oriented descriptor for data-driven lean improvement rather than as a distinct theoretical framework. Design/methodology/approach Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted on 54 peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2010 and May 2025. The review synthesizes ML techniques, targeted lean tools, operational outcomes, enablers, barriers and emerging research gaps. Findings Supervised learning and deep learning dominate current ML–LM applications, particularly for predictive maintenance, quality control, defect detection and process monitoring. The most frequently targeted lean tools are total productive maintenance, quality control, just-in-time, and value stream mapping. Reported outcomes include improvements in defect rates, downtime, cycle time, cost efficiency and safety; however, the magnitude of these improvements varies across contexts and should not be interpreted as universally generalizable. Key enablers include high-quality data, IT and sensor infrastructure, management support and workforce readiness, while major barriers encompass system integration complexity, skill gaps, weak standardization and limited empirical validation. Originality/value Unlike prior reviews that examine Lean–Industry 4.0 or Lean Six Sigma integration at a broad technological or strategic level (e.g. Vinodh et al., 2020; Sony et al., 2020), this study offers the first focused tool-level synthesis systematically mapping specific ML techniques to individual lean practices and their implementation conditions. The review contributes to the Lean Six Sigma literature by clarifying practical integration patterns and highlighting critical future research directions concerning real-world validation, scalability, sustainability and ethical considerations.

International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
Ibn Haldun University (TR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Digital Transformation in Industry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Toward smarter lean practices: a systematic review of machine learning applications in lean manufacturing — Ali Osman Kuşakçı, Bahar Serevan · International Journal of Lean Six Sigma (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS